.NET vs Trailblazer

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.3K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Trailblazer

Stacks15

Followers25

Votes13

.NET vs Trailblazer: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Language Paradigm**: .NET utilizes the object-oriented programming paradigm, while Trailblazer incorporates a domain-driven design approach that provides more flexibility and modularity in organizing application logic.
   
2. **Framework Compatibility**: .NET is predominantly used with the Windows operating system and Microsoft technologies, whereas Trailblazer can be employed across various platforms due to its lightweight and modular architecture.

3. **Community Support**: .NET has a large community base with extensive documentation and resources available, while Trailblazer has a smaller but dedicated community focused on continuously improving the framework and providing support.

4. **Tooling and Integration**: .NET offers a wide range of tools and integrations with popular IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) such as Visual Studio, whereas Trailblazer focuses on providing tools and libraries tailored for Ruby developers.

5. **Architectural Approach**: .NET follows a traditional layered architecture with a strong emphasis on separation of concerns, whereas Trailblazer promotes a more consolidated approach through the use of operation objects that encapsulate business logic.

In Summary, .NET and Trailblazer differ in their language paradigms, framework compatibility, community support, tooling and integration, and architectural approaches.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Trailblazer

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).
It's been around for longer.
it has better documentation and community.
One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.
Rail's front end support is starting to waver.
C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.
Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k

Comments

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Noe

Software Engineer

Aug 13, 2021

Decided

Node Js have worked incredible great for me on every project I had. It is fast enough to support big and small apps, you do not have to worry about performance, because it is very capable of building a big REST API.

One advantage is that the learning curve is lower when you have used javascript on web browser as frontend, so, it is easy to migrate from Frontend to Backend with node.

Node Package Manager (NPM) has an incredible amount of packages from many developers, so you can use them on your project as you need them.

Code is easy to support, way different than Java Legacy code.

114k views114k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Trailblazer
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	Trailblazer is a thin layer on top of Rails. It gently enforces encapsulation, an intuitive code structure and gives you an object-oriented architecture. In a nutshell: Trailblazer makes you write logicless models that purely act as data objects, don't contain callbacks, nested attributes, validations or domain logic. It removes bulky controllers and strong_parameters by supplying additional layers to hold that code and completely replaces helpers.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.3K	Stacks 15
Followers 5.9K	Followers 25
Votes 1.9K	Votes 13
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	Pros 5 Trailblazer allows creating sane, large apps in Rails 3 Separates business logic from framework 2 Improves maintainability 2 Sound Software Architecture principals 1 Makes Rails better Cons 1 Hasn't been on Thoughtworks radar since 2014
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	Ruby Rails

What are some alternatives to .NET, Trailblazer?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Trailblazer: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Language Paradigm**: .NET utilizes the object-oriented programming paradigm, while Trailblazer incorporates a domain-driven design approach that provides more flexibility and modularity in organizing application logic.
   
2. **Framework Compatibility**: .NET is predominantly used with the Windows operating system and Microsoft technologies, whereas Trailblazer can be employed across various platforms due to its lightweight and modular architecture.

3. **Community Support**: .NET has a large community base with extensive documentation and resources available, while Trailblazer has a smaller but dedicated community focused on continuously improving the framework and providing support.

4. **Tooling and Integration**: .NET offers a wide range of tools and integrations with popular IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) such as Visual Studio, whereas Trailblazer focuses on providing tools and libraries tailored for Ruby developers.

5. **Architectural Approach**: .NET follows a traditional layered architecture with a strong emphasis on separation of concerns, whereas Trailblazer promotes a more consolidated approach through the use of operation objects that encapsulate business logic.

In Summary, .NET and Trailblazer differ in their language paradigms, framework compatibility, community support, tooling and integration, and architectural approaches.

.NET vs Trailblazer

Overview