StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Duo vs Ping Identity

Duo vs Ping Identity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Duo
Duo
Stacks24
Followers43
Votes1
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks115
Ping Identity
Ping Identity
Stacks18
Followers75
Votes37

Duo vs Ping Identity: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of identity and access management, two prominent solutions, Duo and Ping Identity, offer distinct features and functionalities for businesses. Understanding the key differences between the two can help organizations make informed decisions regarding the implementation of these tools.

  1. Authentication Methods: Duo primarily focuses on providing multi-factor authentication solutions, offering a variety of methods such as push notifications, SMS, phone calls, and hardware tokens. On the other hand, Ping Identity offers a broader set of identity and access management solutions, including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and user directory services.

  2. Target Audience: Duo is well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses or organizations looking for a straightforward multi-factor authentication solution that is easy to deploy and manage. In contrast, Ping Identity caters to enterprise-level customers with complex identity management needs, offering scalability, customizations, and integrations with various IT systems.

  3. Deployment Options: Duo provides cloud-based authentication services, making it simple to integrate and deploy without significant infrastructure requirements. Ping Identity, however, offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving organizations more flexibility in choosing the most suitable setup for their specific requirements.

  4. Integration Capabilities: While Duo focuses on integrating with a wide range of applications and services through pre-built connectors and APIs, Ping Identity stands out for its robust integration capabilities with various systems, protocols, and standards like SAML, OAuth, and SCIM.

  5. User Experience: Duo prioritizes user-friendly interfaces and seamless authentication processes, aiming for a smooth user experience. Ping Identity also offers a positive user experience but emphasizes more on providing advanced security features and customizable policies to meet the organization's specific security requirements.

  6. Cost Structure: Due to its focus on multi-factor authentication, Duo typically offers more straightforward and transparent pricing models based on the number of users or authentications. Ping Identity, being a comprehensive identity management solution, may have a more complex pricing structure based on factors like the number of users, features utilized, and additional services required.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Duo and Ping Identity is essential for organizations to choose the most suitable identity and access management solution based on their specific needs and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Duo
Duo
Ping Identity
Ping Identity

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

It provides an identity and access management platform enabling the right people access to the right things seamlessly and securely.

has first-class support for Javascript, HTML and CSS;exposes a unix-y command line interface;pulls source directly from GitHub with semantic versioning;supports source transforms, like Coffeescript or Sass;does not require a manifest
Authenticate users leveraging any mobile device and contextual mobile data.; Enable secure single sign-on to any application from anywhere on any device.; Authorize access to only the web, mobile and API resources users need.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
115
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24
Stacks
18
Followers
43
Followers
75
Votes
1
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Lean and efficient
Pros
  • 4
    OIDC
  • 3
    IdP
  • 3
    SSO
  • 3
    SAML
  • 2
    OAUTH 2.0

What are some alternatives to Duo, Ping Identity?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Okta

Okta

Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp