Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Echo

281
184
+ 1
59
Grape

104
106
+ 1
10
Add tool

Echo vs Grape: What are the differences?

Developers describe Echo as "Golang HTTP server framework". Echo is a fast and unfancy HTTP server framework for Go (Golang). Up to 10x faster than the rest. On the other hand, Grape is detailed as "An opinionated micro-framework for creating REST-like APIs in Ruby". Grape is a REST-like API micro-framework for Ruby. It's designed to run on Rack or complement existing web application frameworks such as Rails and Sinatra by providing a simple DSL to easily develop RESTful APIs. It has built-in support for common conventions, including multiple formats, subdomain/prefix restriction, content negotiation, versioning and much more.

Echo and Grape can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

"Highly customizable" is the primary reason why developers consider Echo over the competitors, whereas "Well documented" was stated as the key factor in picking Grape.

Echo and Grape are both open source tools. It seems that Echo with 14.4K GitHub stars and 1.31K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Grape with 8.87K GitHub stars and 1.09K GitHub forks.

Hazeorid, Orangesys Inc., and CampusBox are some of the popular companies that use Echo, whereas Grape is used by DivShot, TaxJar, and Master Of Code Global. Echo has a broader approval, being mentioned in 18 company stacks & 12 developers stacks; compared to Grape, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Echo
Pros of Grape
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 10
    Performance
  • 9
    Open source
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 7
    Middleware
  • 3
    Minimal
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Well documented
  • 2
    Can be used to apply good security to the whole API

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Echo
Cons of Grape
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Code structure makes reuse difficult

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Echo?

    It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

    What is Grape?

    Grape is a REST-like API micro-framework for Ruby. It's designed to run on Rack or complement existing web application frameworks such as Rails and Sinatra by providing a simple DSL to easily develop RESTful APIs. It has built-in support for common conventions, including multiple formats, subdomain/prefix restriction, content negotiation, versioning and much more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Echo and Grape as a desired skillset
    What companies use Echo?
    What companies use Grape?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Echo or Grape.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Echo?
    What tools integrate with Grape?
    What are some alternatives to Echo and Grape?
    Alexa
    It is a cloud-based voice service and the brain behind tens of millions of devices including the Echo family of devices, FireTV, Fire Tablet, and third-party devices. You can build voice experiences, or skills, that make everyday tasks faster, easier, and more delightful for customers.
    ExpressJS
    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.
    Flask
    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.
    Django REST framework
    It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.
    Sinatra
    Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.
    See all alternatives