StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Guzzle

Echo vs Guzzle

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Guzzle
Guzzle
Stacks794
Followers132
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.4K
Forks2.4K
Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K

Echo vs Guzzle: What are the differences?

Echo: Golang HTTP server framework. Echo is a fast and unfancy HTTP server framework for Go (Golang). Up to 10x faster than the rest; Guzzle: PHP HTTP client that makes it easy to send HTTP requests and trivial to integrate with web services. Guzzle is a PHP HTTP client that makes it easy to send HTTP requests and trivial to integrate with web services.

Echo and Guzzle can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Echo are:

  • Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes
  • Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs
  • Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server

On the other hand, Guzzle provides the following key features:

  • Manages things like persistent connections, represents query strings as collections, simplifies sending streaming POST requests with fields and files, and abstracts away the underlying HTTP transport layer.
  • Can send both synchronous and asynchronous requests using the same interface without requiring a dependency on a specific event loop.
  • Pluggable HTTP handlers allows Guzzle to integrate with any method you choose for sending HTTP requests over the wire (e.g., cURL, sockets, PHP’s stream wrapper, non-blocking event loops like React, etc.).

Echo and Guzzle are both open source tools. Guzzle with 17.1K GitHub stars and 1.95K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Echo with 14.4K GitHub stars and 1.31K GitHub forks.

Hazeorid, Orangesys Inc., and CampusBox are some of the popular companies that use Echo, whereas Guzzle is used by Wireless Logic, Cherry, and Prombox. Echo has a broader approval, being mentioned in 18 company stacks & 12 developers stacks; compared to Guzzle, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Guzzle
Guzzle
Echo
Echo

Guzzle is a PHP HTTP client that makes it easy to send HTTP requests and trivial to integrate with web services.

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Manages things like persistent connections, represents query strings as collections, simplifies sending streaming POST requests with fields and files, and abstracts away the underlying HTTP transport layer.;Can send both synchronous and asynchronous requests using the same interface without requiring a dependency on a specific event loop.;Pluggable HTTP handlers allows Guzzle to integrate with any method you choose for sending HTTP requests over the wire (e.g., cURL, sockets, PHP’s stream wrapper, non-blocking event loops like React, etc.).;Guzzle makes it so that you no longer need to fool around with cURL options, stream contexts, or sockets.
Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.4K
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
794
Stacks
346
Followers
132
Followers
187
Votes
0
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Guzzle, Echo?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase