StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Nameko

Echo vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K
Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468

Echo vs Nameko: What are the differences?

Developers describe Echo as "Golang HTTP server framework". Echo is a fast and unfancy HTTP server framework for Go (Golang). Up to 10x faster than the rest. On the other hand, Nameko is detailed as "Python microservices framework". Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Echo and Nameko can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Echo are:

  • Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes
  • Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs
  • Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server

On the other hand, Nameko provides the following key features:

  • Focus on business logic
  • Distributed and scalable
  • Extensible

Echo and Nameko are both open source tools. It seems that Echo with 14.8K GitHub stars and 1.35K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Nameko with 2.98K GitHub stars and 290 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Echo, Nameko

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Echo
Echo
Nameko
Nameko

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
468
Stacks
346
Stacks
20
Followers
187
Followers
79
Votes
59
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to Echo, Nameko?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot