StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Echo vs Rails API

Echo vs Rails API

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails API
Rails API
Stacks95
Followers142
Votes16
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks275
Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K

Echo vs Rails API: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides a comparison between Echo and Rails API, focusing on key differences between the two technologies.

1. **Language**:
   Echo is written in Go, while Rails API is based on Ruby on Rails. This means that developers need to have proficiency in either Go or Ruby to work effectively with Echo or Rails API, respectively.

2. **Performance**:
   Echo is known for its high performance due to being a lightweight framework, making it suitable for building fast and efficient applications. On the other hand, Rails API, while powerful, may not perform as well as Echo in high-traffic scenarios.

3. **Flexibility**:
   Rails API offers a more opinionated structure with conventions that guide developers on how to build applications. In contrast, Echo provides more flexibility and allows developers to have more control over the architecture and design decisions of their applications.

4. **Community Support**:
   Ruby on Rails has a large and active community that provides extensive resources, tutorials, and plugins to support developers. While Echo has been gaining popularity, it may not offer the same level of community support as Rails API.

5. **Learning Curve**:
   Echo is designed to be minimalist and straightforward, which can result in a shorter learning curve for developers who are new to the framework. Conversely, Rails API, with its more comprehensive and feature-rich nature, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

6. **Scalability**:
   Echo is often touted for its scalability, making it suitable for building large-scale applications that can handle a high volume of traffic. While Rails API can also be scaled, it may require more effort and optimization compared to Echo.

In Summary, this markdown highlights key differences between Echo and Rails API, including the programming language, performance, flexibility, community support, learning curve, and scalability of each framework. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rails API
Rails API
Echo
Echo

Rails::API is a subset of a normal Rails application, created for applications that don't require all functionality that a complete Rails application provides. It is a bit more lightweight, and consequently a bit faster than a normal Rails application. The main example for its usage is in API applications only, where you usually don't need the entire Rails middleware stack nor template generation.

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

-
Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
275
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
95
Stacks
346
Followers
142
Followers
187
Votes
16
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Great for quick decoupled apps
  • 3
    Simply the best
  • 2
    Soon to be merged into core Rails 5
  • 1
    Logging by default
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Rails API, Echo?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase