Echo vs React Native

Overview

React Native

Stacks34.4K

Followers29.5K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars124.4K

Forks24.9K

Echo

Stacks346

Followers187

Votes59

GitHub Stars31.8K

Forks2.3K

Echo vs React Native: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Rendering Engine Echo uses a component-based rendering engine, where components are responsible for rendering and updating the user interface. React Native, on the other hand, uses a JavaScript bridge to render native components, allowing it to have direct access to the native rendering engine. This results in a more efficient rendering process and better performance compared to Echo.
Key Difference 2: Cross-Platform Compatibility While both Echo and React Native offer cross-platform development capabilities, the approach differs significantly. Echo focuses on building cross-platform apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. React Native, on the other hand, allows developers to build truly native apps that can be deployed on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and even desktop. This gives React Native a broader reach and more versatility in terms of platform compatibility.
Key Difference 3: Development Experience Echo leverages web development tools and frameworks, making it easy for web developers to transition into mobile app development. It provides a familiar development environment and workflow for those already experienced in web development. React Native, on the other hand, requires developers to learn and understand concepts specific to mobile app development, such as native UI components and platform-specific APIs. This can result in a learning curve for developers who are new to mobile app development.
Key Difference 4: Community Support and Ecosystem React Native has a larger and more active community compared to Echo. This results in a more extensive ecosystem of libraries, tools, and resources available for React Native developers. The community support also means that any issues or bugs in React Native are more likely to be quickly addressed and resolved. Echo, although still actively maintained, has a relatively smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.
Key Difference 5: Performance and Native Integration React Native, being able to directly access the native rendering engine, offers better performance and smoother user experience compared to Echo. It also allows seamless integration with native device features and APIs, providing access to a wider range of hardware functionalities. Echo, while efficient, may face limitations in terms of performance and device integration due to its web-based approach.
Key Difference 6: Market Adoption and Popularity React Native has gained significant popularity and is widely adopted by both individual developers and large companies for mobile app development. It is backed by Facebook, which adds to its credibility and widespread usage. Echo, although known for its simplicity and ease of use, may not have the same level of market adoption and popularity as React Native.

In Summary, Echo and React Native differ in terms of rendering engine, cross-platform compatibility, development experience, community support, performance, and market adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on React Native, Echo

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Andrea

May 26, 2020

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

Vue Native

React

I'm a huge fan of Vue.js and I'm pretty comfortable with it. I need to build a mobile app for my company and I was now wondering whether I could make use of VueJS with Vue Native instead of switching to React. I know Vue Native builds on top of RN. My question is whether I'd have as much freedom with Vue Native over RN and whether you feel like Vue Native is "production ready" or not. Not sure of which shortcomings I may find using Vue Native... Thanks a lot!!!

336k views336k

Comments

Furqan

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

React Native

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

@{#newbie}|topic:null|

325k views325k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React Native	Echo
React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.	It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).
Native iOS Components;Asynchronous Execution;Touch Handling;Flexbox and Styling; Polyfills	Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 124.4K	GitHub Stars 31.8K
GitHub Forks 24.9K	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 34.4K	Stacks 346
Followers 29.5K	Followers 187
Votes 1.2K	Votes 59
Pros & Cons
Pros 214 Learn once write everywhere 174 Cross platform 169 Javascript 122 Native ios components 69 Built by facebook Cons 24 Javascript 19 Built by facebook 12 Cant use CSS 4 30 FPS Limit 2 Slow	Pros 11 Easy to use 10 Highly customizable 10 Performance 9 Open source 9 Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available	Golang

What are some alternatives to React Native, Echo?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Related Comparisons

Echo vs React Native: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Rendering Engine Echo uses a component-based rendering engine, where components are responsible for rendering and updating the user interface. React Native, on the other hand, uses a JavaScript bridge to render native components, allowing it to have direct access to the native rendering engine. This results in a more efficient rendering process and better performance compared to Echo.
Key Difference 2: Cross-Platform Compatibility While both Echo and React Native offer cross-platform development capabilities, the approach differs significantly. Echo focuses on building cross-platform apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. React Native, on the other hand, allows developers to build truly native apps that can be deployed on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and even desktop. This gives React Native a broader reach and more versatility in terms of platform compatibility.
Key Difference 3: Development Experience Echo leverages web development tools and frameworks, making it easy for web developers to transition into mobile app development. It provides a familiar development environment and workflow for those already experienced in web development. React Native, on the other hand, requires developers to learn and understand concepts specific to mobile app development, such as native UI components and platform-specific APIs. This can result in a learning curve for developers who are new to mobile app development.
Key Difference 4: Community Support and Ecosystem React Native has a larger and more active community compared to Echo. This results in a more extensive ecosystem of libraries, tools, and resources available for React Native developers. The community support also means that any issues or bugs in React Native are more likely to be quickly addressed and resolved. Echo, although still actively maintained, has a relatively smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.
Key Difference 5: Performance and Native Integration React Native, being able to directly access the native rendering engine, offers better performance and smoother user experience compared to Echo. It also allows seamless integration with native device features and APIs, providing access to a wider range of hardware functionalities. Echo, while efficient, may face limitations in terms of performance and device integration due to its web-based approach.
Key Difference 6: Market Adoption and Popularity React Native has gained significant popularity and is widely adopted by both individual developers and large companies for mobile app development. It is backed by Facebook, which adds to its credibility and widespread usage. Echo, although known for its simplicity and ease of use, may not have the same level of market adoption and popularity as React Native.

In Summary, Echo and React Native differ in terms of rendering engine, cross-platform compatibility, development experience, community support, performance, and market adoption.

Echo vs React Native

Overview