StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Electron vs Mozilla Brick

Electron vs Mozilla Brick

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mozilla Brick
Mozilla Brick
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes1
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks201
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Electron vs Mozilla Brick: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

  1. Architecture: Electron is built on top of Chromium and Node.js while Mozilla Brick is built on top of Firefox OS. This difference in architectural foundation affects the way the two frameworks interact with the underlying system and the performance of the applications developed using them.

  2. Platform Support: Electron supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a broader range of platform compatibility for developers. In contrast, Mozilla Brick is more focused on supporting the Firefox OS platform, limiting its reach to devices and environments that are compatible with Firefox OS.

  3. Developer Community: Electron has a larger and more active developer community compared to Mozilla Brick. This difference in community support can impact the availability of resources, documentation, and third-party plugins/extensions for developers using these frameworks.

  4. Customization Options: Electron offers more flexibility and customization options for developers to create feature-rich desktop applications as compared to Mozilla Brick, which may have more limitations in terms of customization and extensibility.

  5. Popularity and Adoption: Electron has gained widespread popularity and adoption among developers for building cross-platform desktop applications, while Mozilla Brick has a more niche audience due to its focus on Firefox OS-specific applications. This difference in popularity can influence the availability of resources and support for developers using these frameworks.

  6. Performance: Electron is known for its efficient performance and speed, allowing developers to create fast and responsive desktop applications. On the other hand, Mozilla Brick may have limitations in terms of performance optimizations, impacting the overall user experience of the applications built using this framework.

In Summary, Electron and Mozilla Brick differ in their architecture, platform support, developer community, customization options, popularity, and performance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mozilla Brick
Mozilla Brick
Electron
Electron

Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

-
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
201
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
12
Followers
10.0K
Votes
1
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Inovative
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection

What are some alternatives to Mozilla Brick, Electron?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase