StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Electron vs PHP-MVC

Electron vs PHP-MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Electron vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Electron and PHP-MVC. Electron is a framework used for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, while PHP-MVC is a design pattern used for developing web applications by separating the application logic from the presentation layer.

  1. Architecture: Electron uses a single-process architecture where the main process controls the application's lifecycle and renders web pages in separate browser windows. On the other hand, PHP-MVC follows a server-client architecture where the server-side (PHP) handles the logic and data, while the client-side (HTML, CSS, JS) handles the presentation and user interface.

  2. Platform Independence: Electron provides true cross-platform compatibility, allowing developers to build desktop applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux using the same codebase. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is a server-side technology that can be used on any operating system as long as it supports PHP.

  3. Application Type: Electron is primarily used to develop desktop applications with rich user interfaces and access to system-level functionalities. It is suitable for creating standalone applications like text editors, media players, and chat applications. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is used for developing web applications that can be accessed through web browsers. It is suitable for building dynamic websites, e-commerce platforms, and content management systems.

  4. Deployment: Electron applications are typically packaged as native installers (e.g., .exe, .dmg) that users can download and install on their systems. This allows for offline usage and direct access to the operating system. PHP-MVC applications, on the other hand, are deployed on a web server and accessed through a web browser. Users require an active internet connection to access and use the application.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Electron has a large and active community of developers and a well-established ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools. It has gained popularity due to its versatility and ease of use. PHP-MVC also has a strong community and ecosystem, especially within the PHP development community. There are various PHP frameworks like Laravel, CodeIgniter, and CakePHP that follow the MVC pattern and provide additional features and functionality.

  6. Development Skills: Developing Electron applications requires knowledge of web technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and Node.js. It also requires familiarity with desktop application concepts and APIs. On the other hand, PHP-MVC development requires proficiency in PHP, database management, and web development concepts like HTTP, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Both frameworks have their own learning curves and require different skill sets.

In summary, Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies, while PHP-MVC is a design pattern for developing server-side web applications. Electron provides a versatile, standalone application development environment, while PHP-MVC focuses on building dynamic web applications accessed through web browsers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Electron
Electron

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

-
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
Stacks
106
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
222
Followers
10.0K
Votes
3
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
Integrations
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, Electron?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase