Elm vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?
Elm can be classified as a tool in the "Languages" category, while Material Design for Angular is grouped under "Front-End Frameworks".
"Code stays clean" is the primary reason why developers consider Elm over the competitors, whereas "Ui components" was stated as the key factor in picking Material Design for Angular.
Elm and Material Design for Angular are both open source tools. It seems that Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Elm with 5.26K GitHub stars and 421 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Material Design for Angular has a broader approval, being mentioned in 279 company stacks & 369 developers stacks; compared to Elm, which is listed in 27 company stacks and 34 developer stacks.
What is Elm?
What is Material Design for Angular?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Elm?
The Angular Material Design framework is used by the Promethean TV Broadcast Center Tool and provides a common set of UI/UX elements on top of Angular.
Used the concept idea of Material Design from Google for our basic UI. This one is a great implementation source for our Angular Framework.
The main application uses this, it's great and solid base for app development in AngularJS.