Ember.js vs Spring-Boot

Overview

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Ember.js vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ember.js and Spring Boot are both popular web development frameworks that offer unique features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between these two frameworks can help developers make informed decisions when selecting the right tool for their projects.

Architecture: Ember.js is a front-end JavaScript framework that follows the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) architecture pattern, focusing on building interactive web applications with dynamic user interfaces. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a back-end Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture pattern, enabling developers to create robust and scalable server-side applications.
Language: Ember.js is primarily based on JavaScript and utilizes the Handlebars templating language for building user interfaces. In contrast, Spring Boot is based on Java, which is known for its scalability, stability, and versatility. Java developers can take advantage of Spring Boot's vast ecosystem and libraries for enterprise-level application development.
Community Support: Ember.js has a strong and active community that regularly contributes to the framework's development, providing various plugins, add-ons, and resources to streamline the development process. Spring Boot, backed by the larger Spring ecosystem, offers extensive community support with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and forums for developers to seek assistance and guidance.
Configuration: Ember.js follows the "convention over configuration" principle, where developers adhere to predefined conventions to minimize configuration settings, allowing for rapid application development. In contrast, Spring Boot emphasizes flexibility and customization, offering a wide range of configuration options to tailor applications according to specific requirements.
Deployment: Ember.js applications are typically deployed as static assets on a web server or through a content delivery network (CDN), making them well-suited for single-page applications and client-side rendering. Spring Boot applications, being server-side applications, are typically deployed on application servers or cloud platforms, enabling them to handle complex business logic and database operations efficiently.
Scalability: Ember.js is well-suited for building interactive and dynamic user interfaces, making it ideal for front-end development but may face challenges when scaling to handle large volumes of server-side operations. Spring Boot, with its robust Java backend and support for enterprise-grade applications, offers scalability and performance optimizations to handle complex server-side functionalities and high loads effectively.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Ember.js and Spring Boot in terms of architecture, language, community support, configuration, deployment, and scalability can help developers choose the right framework for their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Spring Boot

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js	Spring Boot
A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.	Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
Creating web apps;Building UI	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars 78.9K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 41.6K
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 26.7K
Followers 865	Followers 24.3K
Votes 775	Votes 1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 2 Very little flexibility 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful	Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive
Integrations
Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap	Spring Java

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Ember.js vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: Ember.js is a front-end JavaScript framework that follows the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) architecture pattern, focusing on building interactive web applications with dynamic user interfaces. On the other hand, Spring Boot is a back-end Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture pattern, enabling developers to create robust and scalable server-side applications.
Language: Ember.js is primarily based on JavaScript and utilizes the Handlebars templating language for building user interfaces. In contrast, Spring Boot is based on Java, which is known for its scalability, stability, and versatility. Java developers can take advantage of Spring Boot's vast ecosystem and libraries for enterprise-level application development.
Community Support: Ember.js has a strong and active community that regularly contributes to the framework's development, providing various plugins, add-ons, and resources to streamline the development process. Spring Boot, backed by the larger Spring ecosystem, offers extensive community support with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and forums for developers to seek assistance and guidance.
Configuration: Ember.js follows the "convention over configuration" principle, where developers adhere to predefined conventions to minimize configuration settings, allowing for rapid application development. In contrast, Spring Boot emphasizes flexibility and customization, offering a wide range of configuration options to tailor applications according to specific requirements.
Deployment: Ember.js applications are typically deployed as static assets on a web server or through a content delivery network (CDN), making them well-suited for single-page applications and client-side rendering. Spring Boot applications, being server-side applications, are typically deployed on application servers or cloud platforms, enabling them to handle complex business logic and database operations efficiently.
Scalability: Ember.js is well-suited for building interactive and dynamic user interfaces, making it ideal for front-end development but may face challenges when scaling to handle large volumes of server-side operations. Spring Boot, with its robust Java backend and support for enterprise-grade applications, offers scalability and performance optimizations to handle complex server-side functionalities and high loads effectively.

Ember.js vs Spring-Boot

Overview