Erlang vs TypeScript

Overview

Erlang

Stacks1.4K

Followers749

Votes345

GitHub Stars11.9K

Forks3.0K

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

Erlang vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing Erlang and TypeScript, we can identify key differences that distinguish the two programming languages.

Concurrency Model: Erlang is built for concurrency and distributed systems, utilizing lightweight processes known as "actors" that communicate via message passing. On the other hand, TypeScript does not have built-in support for this level of concurrency and parallelism, relying more on traditional threading models.
Strong Typing: TypeScript is a statically typed language, meaning that type checking is done at compile time, providing more robustness and catching errors earlier in the development process. Erlang, on the other hand, is dynamically typed, allowing for more flexibility but potentially leading to runtime errors due to type mismatches.
Purpose and Applications: Erlang is primarily used for building fault-tolerant and scalable telecommunications systems, particularly in telecom infrastructure and messaging platforms. TypeScript, being a superset of JavaScript, is commonly employed for web development where type checking and scalability are crucial.
Tooling and Ecosystem: TypeScript benefits from a rich ecosystem of tools, IDE support, and libraries due to its association with JavaScript. Erlang, while having a mature ecosystem for telecom applications, may lack the same breadth and depth as TypeScript in other areas of software development.
Execution Environment: Erlang runs on its own virtual machine known as the BEAM (Erlang Abstract Machine), providing specific optimizations for Erlang's concurrency model. TypeScript, being based on JavaScript, relies on various JavaScript engines like V8 or SpiderMonkey for execution.
Learning Curve: TypeScript is more approachable for developers coming from a JavaScript background due to its syntactical similarities and gradual typing adoption. In contrast, Erlang's unique syntax and functional programming paradigm may present a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with functional languages.

In Summary, the key differences between Erlang and TypeScript lie in their concurrency model, type system, target applications, tooling support, execution environment, and learning curve for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Erlang, TypeScript

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Erlang	TypeScript
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.	TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.9K	GitHub Stars 106.6K
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks 13.1K
Stacks 1.4K	Stacks 105.1K
Followers 749	Followers 74.2K
Votes 345	Votes 503
Pros & Cons
Pros 62 Real time, distributed applications 62 Concurrency Support 58 Fault tolerance 36 Soft real-time 32 Open source Cons 1 Languange is not popular demand	Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype

What are some alternatives to Erlang, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Erlang vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing Erlang and TypeScript, we can identify key differences that distinguish the two programming languages.

Concurrency Model: Erlang is built for concurrency and distributed systems, utilizing lightweight processes known as "actors" that communicate via message passing. On the other hand, TypeScript does not have built-in support for this level of concurrency and parallelism, relying more on traditional threading models.
Strong Typing: TypeScript is a statically typed language, meaning that type checking is done at compile time, providing more robustness and catching errors earlier in the development process. Erlang, on the other hand, is dynamically typed, allowing for more flexibility but potentially leading to runtime errors due to type mismatches.
Purpose and Applications: Erlang is primarily used for building fault-tolerant and scalable telecommunications systems, particularly in telecom infrastructure and messaging platforms. TypeScript, being a superset of JavaScript, is commonly employed for web development where type checking and scalability are crucial.
Tooling and Ecosystem: TypeScript benefits from a rich ecosystem of tools, IDE support, and libraries due to its association with JavaScript. Erlang, while having a mature ecosystem for telecom applications, may lack the same breadth and depth as TypeScript in other areas of software development.
Execution Environment: Erlang runs on its own virtual machine known as the BEAM (Erlang Abstract Machine), providing specific optimizations for Erlang's concurrency model. TypeScript, being based on JavaScript, relies on various JavaScript engines like V8 or SpiderMonkey for execution.
Learning Curve: TypeScript is more approachable for developers coming from a JavaScript background due to its syntactical similarities and gradual typing adoption. In contrast, Erlang's unique syntax and functional programming paradigm may present a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with functional languages.

Erlang vs TypeScript

Overview

Erlang vs TypeScript: What are the differences?