ESLint vs Spacemacs

Overview

Spacemacs

Stacks189

Followers200

Votes86

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks4.9K

ESLint

Stacks38.6K

Followers14.0K

Votes28

GitHub Stars26.6K

Forks4.8K

ESLint vs Spacemacs: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web development, tools like ESLint and Spacemacs play a crucial role in ensuring code quality and productivity. While both serve as valuable assets to developers, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. Extensibility: ESLint is primarily focused on linting JavaScript code to identify and fix errors, while Spacemacs is an extensible text editor that integrates various tools for seamless coding experience.

2. Language support: ESLint is specifically designed for JavaScript, whereas Spacemacs supports multiple programming languages like Python, Ruby, and more, making it a versatile choice for developers working with different technologies.

3. User Interface: ESLint is a command-line tool that provides feedback on code quality through the terminal, whereas Spacemacs offers a graphical user interface with extensive customization options for a personalized coding environment.

4. Integration with tools: ESLint can be integrated with various code editors and IDEs, providing real-time feedback and suggestions, while Spacemacs comes with built-in support for different development tools and frameworks to streamline the coding process.

5. Collaboration features: ESLint is more suitable for individual developers or small teams working on JavaScript projects, whereas Spacemacs offers collaboration features and plugins for team-based projects, enhancing communication and workflow efficiency.

6. Learning curve: ESLint requires configuration setup and understanding of rules to effectively use the tool, while Spacemacs comes with pre-configured settings and keybindings, reducing the learning curve for new users.

In Summary, ESLint and Spacemacs differ in extensibility, language support, user interface, integration with tools, collaboration features, and learning curve, catering to the specific needs and preferences of developers in the web development landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spacemacs, ESLint

Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceon

Prettier

ESLint

gulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k

Comments

Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
vscode workspace config: format on save
separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spacemacs	ESLint
Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.	A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
Batteries Included;Nice UI;Excellent ergonomics;Convenient and Mnemonic Key Bindings;Great Documentation	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars 26.6K
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks 4.8K
Stacks 189	Stacks 38.6K
Followers 200	Followers 14.0K
Votes 86	Votes 28
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Advanced support for Vim key bindings 12 Discoverability 10 Easy setup 10 Never have to touch the mouse 7 Cross-platform	Pros 8 Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore 6 Free 6 IDE Integration 4 Customizable 2 Broad ecosystem of support & users
Integrations
Emacs	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Spacemacs, ESLint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ReSharper

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

ESLint vs Spacemacs: What are the differences?

ESLint vs Spacemacs

Overview