Espresso.js vs Node.js

Overview

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

Espresso.js

Stacks13

Followers15

Votes0

Espresso.js vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Espresso.js and Node.js, there are several key differences that distinguish the two popular frameworks for JavaScript development.

Execution Environment: Node.js is a runtime environment that allows JavaScript to be executed outside of a browser, while Espresso.js is specifically designed for server-side applications within the browser. This key difference influences the scope and capabilities of the applications developed using both frameworks.
Concurrency Model: Node.js utilizes a single-threaded event-driven architecture, while Espresso.js is based on the Multi-Threaded Shared-Nothing Architecture (MTSNA) that allows for parallel processing of tasks. This difference impacts the handling of concurrent requests and can affect the overall performance of the applications.
Community Support: Node.js has a larger and more established community compared to Espresso.js, which means a wider range of libraries, plugins, and resources are available for developers. This difference can affect the ease of development, debugging, and maintenance of applications built using these frameworks.
Scalability: Node.js is known for its scalability and is commonly used in building scalable web applications, while Espresso.js may be more limited in terms of scalability due to its design for server-side browser applications. This difference can impact the growth and expansion of applications over time.
Learning Curve: Node.js is generally considered easier to learn and use compared to Espresso.js, which may have a steeper learning curve due to its specialized focus on server-side browser applications. This difference can affect the onboarding process of developers and the time required to become proficient in using the framework.
Performance: Node.js is known for its high performance and efficiency in handling I/O operations, while Espresso.js may have performance limitations due to its design for browser-based applications. This difference can influence the responsiveness and speed of applications developed with these frameworks.

In Summary, the key differences between Espresso.js and Node.js lie in their execution environment, concurrency model, community support, scalability, learning curve, and performance, which all play a significant role in the development and deployment of JavaScript applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Node.js, Espresso.js

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js	Espresso.js
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.	Espresso.js is a tiny MVC framework inspired by Backbone and React with a focus on simplicity and speed. We've aimed to bring the ideas of unidirectional data flow of Flux to a simple, Backbone-style library.
-	tiny, less than 500 lines and 3kb gzipped;zero dependencies;performance and memory focused;does not aim to support anything below IE10, but may work on older browsers using a shim
Statistics
GitHub Stars 114.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 33.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 200.4K	Stacks 13
Followers 164.5K	Followers 15
Votes 8.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Node.js, Espresso.js?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Espresso.js vs Node.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Espresso.js and Node.js, there are several key differences that distinguish the two popular frameworks for JavaScript development.

Execution Environment: Node.js is a runtime environment that allows JavaScript to be executed outside of a browser, while Espresso.js is specifically designed for server-side applications within the browser. This key difference influences the scope and capabilities of the applications developed using both frameworks.
Concurrency Model: Node.js utilizes a single-threaded event-driven architecture, while Espresso.js is based on the Multi-Threaded Shared-Nothing Architecture (MTSNA) that allows for parallel processing of tasks. This difference impacts the handling of concurrent requests and can affect the overall performance of the applications.
Community Support: Node.js has a larger and more established community compared to Espresso.js, which means a wider range of libraries, plugins, and resources are available for developers. This difference can affect the ease of development, debugging, and maintenance of applications built using these frameworks.
Scalability: Node.js is known for its scalability and is commonly used in building scalable web applications, while Espresso.js may be more limited in terms of scalability due to its design for server-side browser applications. This difference can impact the growth and expansion of applications over time.
Learning Curve: Node.js is generally considered easier to learn and use compared to Espresso.js, which may have a steeper learning curve due to its specialized focus on server-side browser applications. This difference can affect the onboarding process of developers and the time required to become proficient in using the framework.
Performance: Node.js is known for its high performance and efficiency in handling I/O operations, while Espresso.js may have performance limitations due to its design for browser-based applications. This difference can influence the responsiveness and speed of applications developed with these frameworks.

Espresso.js vs Node.js

Overview