Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Eureka vs Keepalived: What are the differences?
Introduction
In the world of distributed systems and high availability, tools like Eureka and Keepalived are crucial for maintaining stability and facilitating seamless failover mechanisms.
Architecture: Eureka is a service registry tool used for service discovery in microservices architecture, while Keepalived is a routing software designed for Linux-based systems to provide high availability by monitoring and managing virtual IP addresses.
Protocol: Eureka uses the REST-based protocol for service registration and discovery, while Keepalived utilizes the VRRP (Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol) to ensure network redundancy and failover in case of node failures.
Language Support: Eureka is primarily designed for Java applications and offers seamless integration with Spring Cloud, making it ideal for microservices development in Java ecosystem. On the other hand, Keepalived can be used with any Linux-based system irrespective of the programming language used.
Clustering: Eureka comes with built-in support for clustering, allowing multiple Eureka servers to communicate and replicate service registry information for fault tolerance. Keepalived, on the other hand, focuses on IP failover and does not inherently support clustering of multiple instances.
Use Cases: Eureka is more suitable for cloud-native applications built on microservices architecture that require dynamic service discovery and load balancing, while Keepalived is preferred for network infrastructure where failover mechanisms for virtual IP addresses are essential to ensure continuous service availability.
Community Support: Eureka is an open-source project maintained by Netflix and boasts a vibrant community of developers and contributors, ensuring regular updates and enhancements. Keepalived, being an open-source project as well, has a dedicated community but may not have the same level of widespread adoption and support compared to Eureka.
In Summary, Eureka and Keepalived differ in architecture, protocol, language support, clustering capabilities, use cases, and community support, catering to distinct needs in the realm of high availability and failover mechanisms in distributed systems.
Pros of Eureka
- Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud21
- Web ui9
- Monitoring8
- Health checking8
- Circuit breaker7
- Netflix battle tested components6
- Service discovery6
- Open Source4
Pros of Keepalived
- Load Balancer2
- Extremely fast (IPVS)2
- 2 nodes HA cluster management1
- Virtual IP HA with VRRP1