FaaS vs Nuclio

Overview

FaaS

Stacks5

Followers28

Votes1

Nuclio

Stacks16

Followers48

Votes11

GitHub Stars5.6K

Forks554

FaaS vs Nuclio: What are the differences?

Event Triggering: One key difference between FaaS and Nuclio is their approach to event triggering. With FaaS, functions are triggered by specific events, such as HTTP requests or messages from a message queue, while Nuclio takes a more granular approach, allowing functions to be triggered by events at the object level within a cloud storage service.
Deployment Flexibility: FaaS platforms typically have limitations on the tools and languages that can be used for development and deployment, whereas Nuclio provides more flexibility by supporting a wider range of languages and tools. This allows developers to leverage their existing skills and tools when working with Nuclio.
Resource Management: In FaaS, resource allocation is managed by the platform provider, and developers have limited control over the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, Nuclio offers more control over resource allocation, allowing developers to optimize performance based on their specific requirements.
Statefulness: FaaS functions are typically stateless, meaning they do not maintain any state between invocations. Nuclio, on the other hand, supports stateful functions, enabling developers to store and access data across multiple invocations. This can be beneficial for applications that require stateful processing.
Monitoring and Logging: Nuclio provides more advanced monitoring and logging capabilities compared to traditional FaaS platforms. Developers can easily track the performance of their functions, analyze resource usage, and troubleshoot issues with Nuclio's built-in monitoring and logging tools.
Extensibility: Nuclio offers greater extensibility through its support for custom triggers, allowing developers to create their own event sources for triggering functions. This flexibility enables developers to integrate Nuclio with a wide range of services and systems, expanding the possibilities for event-driven applications.

In Summary, FaaS and Nuclio differ in their event triggering mechanisms, deployment flexibility, resource management, statefulness support, monitoring capabilities, and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

FaaS	Nuclio
FaaS is a platform for building serverless functions on Docker Swarm Mode with first class metrics. Any UNIX process can be packaged as a function in FaaS enabling you to consume a range of web events without repetitive boiler-plate coding.	nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.
-	Real-time performance; Simple debugging, regression and a multi-versioned CI/CD pipeline; Supports a large variety of open or cloud-specific event and data sources with common APIs; Portable across low-power devices, laptops, on-premises and public clouds
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 554
Stacks 5	Stacks 16
Followers 28	Followers 48
Votes 1	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Simple way to build serverless applications	Pros 1 Enterprise grade 1 Open source 1 Performance 1 Parallelism 1 Autoscaling
Integrations
Docker Docker Swarm	Kubernetes Docker Google Kubernetes Engine Azure Container Service

What are some alternatives to FaaS, Nuclio?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

AWS Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Related Comparisons

FaaS vs Nuclio: What are the differences?

Event Triggering: One key difference between FaaS and Nuclio is their approach to event triggering. With FaaS, functions are triggered by specific events, such as HTTP requests or messages from a message queue, while Nuclio takes a more granular approach, allowing functions to be triggered by events at the object level within a cloud storage service.
Deployment Flexibility: FaaS platforms typically have limitations on the tools and languages that can be used for development and deployment, whereas Nuclio provides more flexibility by supporting a wider range of languages and tools. This allows developers to leverage their existing skills and tools when working with Nuclio.
Resource Management: In FaaS, resource allocation is managed by the platform provider, and developers have limited control over the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, Nuclio offers more control over resource allocation, allowing developers to optimize performance based on their specific requirements.
Statefulness: FaaS functions are typically stateless, meaning they do not maintain any state between invocations. Nuclio, on the other hand, supports stateful functions, enabling developers to store and access data across multiple invocations. This can be beneficial for applications that require stateful processing.
Monitoring and Logging: Nuclio provides more advanced monitoring and logging capabilities compared to traditional FaaS platforms. Developers can easily track the performance of their functions, analyze resource usage, and troubleshoot issues with Nuclio's built-in monitoring and logging tools.
Extensibility: Nuclio offers greater extensibility through its support for custom triggers, allowing developers to create their own event sources for triggering functions. This flexibility enables developers to integrate Nuclio with a wide range of services and systems, expanding the possibilities for event-driven applications.

In Summary, FaaS and Nuclio differ in their event triggering mechanisms, deployment flexibility, resource management, statefulness support, monitoring capabilities, and extensibility.

FaaS vs Nuclio

Overview