StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Fabric.js vs Inferno

Fabric.js vs Inferno

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Inferno
Inferno
Stacks25
Followers64
Votes20
Fabric.js
Fabric.js
Stacks55
Followers170
Votes0
GitHub Stars30.5K
Forks3.6K

Fabric.js vs Inferno: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Fabric.js and Inferno are both popular tools used in web development, but they have key differences that set them apart. Let's explore the specific distinctions between these two technologies.

1. Documentation and Community Support: Fabric.js has a more extensive documentation and a larger user community compared to Inferno. This means that Fabric.js users have easier access to resources, tutorials, and forums for troubleshooting and support.

2. Purpose and Use Case: Fabric.js is primarily a graphics library for rendering canvas elements, making it ideal for creating complex visualizations, interactive animations, and editing images. On the other hand, Inferno is a lightweight framework for building user interfaces, especially for single-page applications where performance is crucial.

3. Development and Maintenance: Fabric.js has been actively developed and maintained since its inception, with frequent updates and bug fixes. Inferno, while also actively maintained, may have slower updates and new features due to its focus on performance optimization.

4. Size and Performance: Inferno is known for its outstanding performance and smaller size compared to other popular frameworks like React, making it a preferred choice for projects where speed and efficiency are top priorities. Meanwhile, Fabric.js, being a graphics library, may have a larger footprint and slightly lower performance when handling complex visual elements.

5. Language and Syntax: Fabric.js is primarily used with JavaScript and HTML5 canvas for creating graphic elements, whereas Inferno focuses on JSX syntax similar to React for building user interfaces. This difference in language and syntax can influence the choice of technology based on the developer's familiarity and project requirements.

6. Component Structure: Inferno uses a Virtual DOM to efficiently update and render components, resulting in faster performance and reduced memory usage. In contrast, Fabric.js directly manipulates canvas elements, offering more control over graphic rendering but potentially requiring more manual optimization for performance-critical applications.

In Summary, Fabric.js and Inferno are distinct tools with differences in documentation, purpose, development, size, language, and component structure that impact their suitability for various web development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Inferno
Inferno
Fabric.js
Fabric.js

Inferno is an isomorphic library for building high-performance user interfaces, which is crucial when targeting mobile devices. Unlike typical virtual DOM libraries like React, Mithril, Virtual-dom, Snabbdom and Om, Inferno uses techniques to separate static and dynamic content. This allows Inferno to only "diff" renders that have dynamic values.

It provides interactive object model on top of canvas element. Fabric also has SVG-to-canvas (and canvas-to-SVG) parser. Using Fabric.js, you can create and populate objects on canvas; objects like simple geometrical shapes

One of the fastest front-end frameworks for rendering UI in the DOM;Components have a similar API to React ES2015 components with inferno-component;Stateless components are fully supported and have more usability thanks to Inferno's hooks system;Isomorphic/universal for easy server-side rendering with inferno-server
Cross-browser Fast;Encapsulated in one object;No browser sniffing for critical functionality;Runs under ES5 strict mode;Runs on a server under Node.js;Follows Semantic Versioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.6K
Stacks
25
Stacks
55
Followers
64
Followers
170
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    React-like api
  • 4
    Faster than React
  • 3
    Smaller bundles
  • 3
    Faster than Angular
  • 3
    Compatibility package for existing React apps
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
WordPress
WordPress
JavaScript
JavaScript
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Inferno, Fabric.js?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot