StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Fabric.js vs React

Fabric.js vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Fabric.js
Fabric.js
Stacks55
Followers170
Votes0
GitHub Stars30.5K
Forks3.6K

Fabric.js vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

Fabric.js and React are both powerful tools used for developing web applications. However, there are key differences between these two frameworks that are important to consider before choosing which one to use for your project.

  1. Rendering Approach: Fabric.js is a canvas library that uses immediate mode rendering, which means that it directly manipulates pixels on the screen. On the other hand, React is a component-based library that uses virtual DOM diffing to efficiently update the user interface.

  2. Data Binding: React utilizes a unidirectional data flow, where data updates flow from parent components down to child components. This allows for efficient and predictable data management. Fabric.js, on the other hand, doesn't have built-in data binding capabilities and requires manual updating of objects on the canvas when the underlying data changes.

  3. Performance: React is designed for building complex UIs with high performance in mind. It optimizes rendering by minimizing DOM manipulations and efficiently updating only the components that have changed. Fabric.js, being a canvas library, provides better performance for rendering large numbers of static objects, as it uses a lower-level rendering API.

  4. Component Reusability: React promotes component reusability and modularity, allowing developers to easily create and reuse components across different parts of an application. Fabric.js, being more focused on canvas manipulation, doesn't have the same level of component reusability, as canvas objects are usually created and manipulated directly.

  5. Event Handling: React provides a declarative way of handling events by defining event handlers within components. This allows for better separation of concerns and more organized code. Fabric.js, being a canvas library, uses a less declarative approach for event handling, as events need to be manually attached to individual canvas objects.

  6. Compatibility: React is compatible with modern web development practices and works well with popular frameworks and libraries. It can be easily integrated into existing projects. Fabric.js, on the other hand, is more suited for projects that heavily rely on canvas-based graphics and may require additional configuration to work seamlessly with other frameworks and libraries.

In summary, the key differences between Fabric.js and React lie in their rendering approaches, data binding capabilities, performance optimizations, component reusability, event handling methods, and overall compatibility with other frameworks and libraries. Understanding these differences will help you make an informed decision when choosing between these two tools for your web development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Fabric.js

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Fabric.js
Fabric.js

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It provides interactive object model on top of canvas element. Fabric also has SVG-to-canvas (and canvas-to-SVG) parser. Using Fabric.js, you can create and populate objects on canvas; objects like simple geometrical shapes

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Cross-browser Fast;Encapsulated in one object;No browser sniffing for critical functionality;Runs under ES5 strict mode;Runs on a server under Node.js;Follows Semantic Versioning
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
30.5K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
3.6K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
55
Followers
147.0K
Followers
170
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
WordPress
WordPress
JavaScript
JavaScript
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to React, Fabric.js?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot