StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Fail2ban vs FortiGate NGFW

Fail2ban vs FortiGate NGFW

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fail2ban
Fail2ban
Stacks64
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.9K
Forks1.4K
FortiGate NGFW
FortiGate NGFW
Stacks12
Followers14
Votes0

Fail2ban vs FortiGate NGFW: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Fail2ban and FortiGate NGFW

  1. Integration with Existing Infrastructure: Fail2ban is a flexible software that can be easily integrated into existing Linux-based infrastructures, making it a suitable choice for organizations already using a Linux server. On the other hand, FortiGate Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) is a hardware appliance that provides network security features, making it more suitable for organizations that require a dedicated hardware solution.

  2. Managed Services: Fail2ban is a self-managed software solution, which means that organizations using it are responsible for performing updates, maintenance, and monitoring of the system. FortiGate NGFW, on the other hand, offers managed services that include support, updates, and maintenance from the vendor, allowing organizations to focus on their core operations.

  3. Scalability: Fail2ban can be easily scaled by adding additional servers and configuring them to work together in a distributed environment. This flexibility allows organizations to handle larger workloads and distribute resources effectively. FortiGate NGFW, on the other hand, provides scalability through the use of high-performance hardware appliances, which can handle high loads without the need for distributed configurations.

  4. Feature Set: Fail2ban focuses primarily on intrusion prevention by blocking IP addresses that show malicious behavior. It analyzes log files and uses various filters to detect and block suspicious activity. FortiGate NGFW, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of network security features, including intrusion prevention, antivirus, web filtering, VPN, and more. This makes FortiGate NGFW a more complete solution for organizations looking for a comprehensive network security solution.

  5. User Interface: Fail2ban is primarily managed through command-line interfaces, which requires expertise in Linux command-line operations. FortiGate NGFW, on the other hand, provides a web-based graphical user interface (GUI) that offers a user-friendly and intuitive experience. This makes it easier for organizations to manage and configure the firewall without extensive knowledge of command-line operations.

  6. Support and Documentation: Fail2ban is an open-source software with a strong community that provides support and documentation through forums, online resources, and user-driven contributions. FortiGate NGFW, on the other hand, is a commercial product with dedicated support services provided by the vendor. It offers comprehensive documentation, vendor support channels, and regular software updates, ensuring that organizations receive timely assistance and access to the latest features and security patches.

In summary, Fail2ban is a flexible software solution that can be integrated into existing Linux infrastructures, while FortiGate NGFW is a dedicated hardware appliance with comprehensive network security features. Fail2ban focuses on intrusion prevention, whereas FortiGate NGFW offers a wide range of security features. Fail2ban is self-managed, while FortiGate NGFW provides managed services. Fail2ban can be easily scaled through distributed configurations, while FortiGate NGFW offers scalability through high-performance hardware appliances. Fail2ban is primarily managed through command-line interfaces, whereas FortiGate NGFW provides a web-based GUI. Fail2ban has community-driven support and documentation, while FortiGate NGFW offers vendor support services and comprehensive documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fail2ban
Fail2ban
FortiGate NGFW
FortiGate NGFW

It is an intrusion prevention software framework that protects computer servers from brute-force attacks. Written in the Python programming language, it is able to run on POSIX systems that have an interface to a packet-control system or firewall installed locally, for example, iptables or TCP Wrapper.

It enables security-driven networking and consolidate industry-leading security capabilities such as intrusion prevention system (IPS), web filtering, secure sockets layer (SSL) inspection, and automated threat protection. It meet the performance needs of highly scalable, hybrid IT architectures, enabling organizations to reduce complexity and manage security risks.

-
Remove uncontrolled blind spots with SSL inspection of all encrypted flows, including TLS 1.3; Industry’s best-of-breed security with automated threat protection; Intelligently share threat information across the entire digital attack surface to provide quick and automated protection; Single console management automation, orchestration, and analytics; Independently certified and continuous threat intelligence updates provide robust protection from known and unknown attacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64
Stacks
12
Followers
57
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Fail2ban, FortiGate NGFW?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope