StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Falcon vs Go

Falcon vs Go

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Golang
Golang
Stacks24.0K
Followers13.9K
Votes3.3K
GitHub Stars130.7K
Forks18.4K
Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89

Falcon vs Go: What are the differences?

Introduction

Falcon and Go are two popular programming languages used for building web applications. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this markdown code, I will provide a concise comparison of these two languages to help you understand their unique features and functionalities.

  1. Syntax: Falcon is a web framework built specifically for Python, while Go is a programming language developed by Google. As a result, the syntax of Falcon revolves around Python, making it more familiar for Python developers, whereas Go has its own syntax that may require some learning for newcomers.

  2. Performance: Go is known for its exceptional performance, thanks to its low memory footprint and efficient concurrency model. On the other hand, Falcon, being built on Python, may have some performance overhead due to the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) and its interpreted nature. However, Falcon can still achieve good performance by utilizing asynchronous programming techniques.

  3. Community & Ecosystem: Go has gained significant popularity since its release and has a large and active community of developers around the world. This has resulted in a robust ecosystem with extensive libraries and tools available for various purposes. Falcon, while having a dedicated community, may not be as widespread as Go, resulting in a comparatively smaller ecosystem with fewer ready-to-use solutions.

  4. Ease of Use: Falcon's simplicity and Python-like syntax make it relatively easier to grasp and work with, especially for developers familiar with Python. Go, while being syntactically different, has a simple and minimalist design, making it easy to write and understand code. However, Go may have a slight learning curve for developers transitioning from other languages.

  5. Scalability: Go shines in terms of scalability due to its built-in support for concurrency and efficient handling of thousands of concurrent connections. This makes it a preferred choice for building high-performance servers and scalable applications. Falcon, on the other hand, can also handle concurrent requests efficiently by utilizing asynchronous libraries, but it may not match the scalability offered by Go out of the box.

  6. Error Handling: Both Falcon and Go provide robust error handling mechanisms. Falcon, being a Python-based framework, relies on Python's exception handling system, which allows developers to catch and handle various types of errors easily. In Go, error handling is a vital part of the language itself, with multiple ways to handle errors effectively, including explicit error checking and the concept of defer.

In summary, Falcon is a Python-based web framework with a familiar syntax and ease of use, while Go is a powerful programming language known for its performance, scalability, and robust error handling capabilities. Depending on your specific needs and preferences, choosing between Falcon and Go will depend on factors such as project requirements, team expertise, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Golang, Falcon

Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

When developing a new blockchain, we as a team chose Go lang over Java and other candidates, due to Go being (a) natively suited to concurrency - there are primitives in the language itself (goroutines, channels) that really help with reasoning about concurrency (b) super fast - build time, running, testing are all much faster that Java, this gives a far superior developer experience (c) shorter and stricter than Java - code is much shorter (less verbose), and there is usually one good way to do things, and even the code formatter that is bundled with Go is very opinionated - over a short time this makes reading other people's code far smoother than having to deal with different styles.

You should be aware that Go presently (v1.13) lacks Generics.

267k views267k
Comments
Ítalo
Ítalo

VP Platform Engineering at Lykon

Feb 19, 2020

Decided

We decided to use python to write our ETLs and import them into metabase via a lambda. Before python we tried using Go, but overall go was way more verbose than Python when writing the ETLs. Go also had some issues managing memory when using the S3 upload manager library. This was a deal breaker for us that made us switch to Python.

In the end the solution was much cleaner and maintainable.

261k views261k
Comments
Mohamed
Mohamed

Software Engineer at YottaHQ Inc.

Dec 2, 2019

Decided

PHP is easy to learn and you can get up and running in no time, available on almost all hosting providers and you can find developers easily. It has some great frameworks for building your backend like Symfony and Laravel. However, it can be challenging when running an enterprise and needs some adjustments, very recommended for starting a new project or startup.

208k views208k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Golang
Golang
Falcon
Falcon

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

-
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
130.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
18.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.0K
Stacks
84
Followers
13.9K
Followers
201
Votes
3.3K
Votes
89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 557
    High-performance
  • 398
    Simple, minimal syntax
  • 365
    Fun to write
  • 305
    Easy concurrency support via goroutines
  • 273
    Fast compilation times
Cons
  • 43
    You waste time in plumbing code catching errors
  • 25
    Verbose
  • 23
    Packages and their path dependencies are braindead
  • 16
    Google's documentations aren't beginer friendly
  • 15
    Dependency management when working on multiple projects
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    Open source
  • 8
    REST oriented
Integrations
Revel
Revel
Martini
Martini
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Golang, Falcon?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase