StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Falcon vs Material Design for Bootstrap

Falcon vs Material Design for Bootstrap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Stacks78
Followers206
Votes46
GitHub Stars65
Forks42
Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89

Falcon vs Material Design for Bootstrap: What are the differences?

What is Falcon? High-performance Python framework for building cloud APIs and web app backends. Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

What is Material Design for Bootstrap? Material Design for Bootstrap. This Bootstrap theme is an easy way to use the new Material Design guidelines by Google in your Bootstrap 3 based application. Just include the theme right after the Bootstrap CSS and include the javascript at the end of your document, everything will be converted to Material Design (paper) style.

Falcon belongs to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack, while Material Design for Bootstrap can be primarily classified under "Front-End Frameworks".

Some of the features offered by Falcon are:

  • Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes
  • Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes
  • Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class

On the other hand, Material Design for Bootstrap provides the following key features:

  • Input fields (text, numeric, email, etc)
  • Textarea
  • Buttons (ripple effect working)

"Python" is the primary reason why developers consider Falcon over the competitors, whereas "Bootstrap" was stated as the key factor in picking Material Design for Bootstrap.

Falcon and Material Design for Bootstrap are both open source tools. Material Design for Bootstrap with 19.9K GitHub stars and 3.31K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Falcon with 6.8K GitHub stars and 707 GitHub forks.

HENNGE, Fivestars, and Vokal are some of the popular companies that use Falcon, whereas Material Design for Bootstrap is used by MXD3D, Itbid, and TypeLead. Falcon has a broader approval, being mentioned in 7 company stacks & 7 developers stacks; compared to Material Design for Bootstrap, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Falcon
Falcon

It is an open source toolkit based on Bootstrap for developing Material Design apps with HTML, CSS, and JS. Quickly prototype your ideas or build your entire app with our Sass variables and mixins, responsive grid system, extensive prebuilt components, and powerful plugins built on jQuery.

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

Input fields; Textarea; Buttons (ripple effect working); Select; Navbar; Button groups; Input groups; Checkbox; Radio; Alerts; Progress bars; Jumbotron; Wells; Dialogs; Lists
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
42
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
78
Stacks
84
Followers
206
Followers
201
Votes
46
Votes
89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Bootstrap
  • 6
    Awesome and simple to use
  • 6
    Light weight
  • 4
    Modern Looks
  • 4
    Responsive
Cons
  • 2
    Not free for premo stuff
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    Well designed
  • 8
    REST oriented
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Bootstrap, Falcon?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase