StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Falcon vs PHP-MVC

Falcon vs PHP-MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89

Falcon vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction

Falcon and PHP-MVC are both web development frameworks that help developers in building web applications. However, there are key differences between these two frameworks that set them apart from each other. In this Markdown, we will discuss the six most important differences between Falcon and PHP-MVC.

  1. Language: The most fundamental difference between Falcon and PHP-MVC is the language they are based on. Falcon is a Python-based framework, while PHP-MVC is obviously PHP-based. This difference in language brings with it different syntax, libraries, and ecosystem, making Falcon more suitable for Python-based projects and PHP-MVC for PHP-based projects.

  2. Architecture: Falcon follows a microservices-oriented architecture, promoting the use of lightweight components and enabling high performance and scalability. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, follows a Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, where the application is divided into three main components, simplifying the development process and allowing better code organization.

  3. Community and Support: In terms of community and support, PHP-MVC has a larger user base and a more active community due to its popularity among PHP developers. This means that finding help, tutorials, and libraries for PHP-MVC will be easier compared to Falcon, which has a smaller community.

  4. Speed and Performance: Falcon, being a Python framework, is known for its speed and performance. It is optimized for running web APIs efficiently and can handle high loads with ease. PHP-MVC, although it is not as fast as Falcon, still provides good performance and is widely used for web application development.

  5. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: PHP-MVC is considered to have a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with PHP. Its syntax and conventions are straightforward and easy to grasp. On the other hand, Falcon may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Python or Python web frameworks.

  6. Available Features and Libraries: Since Falcon is a microframework, it provides only the essential features out-of-the-box, promoting simplicity and flexibility. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, comes with a wide range of features and libraries built-in, making it easier to handle various aspects of web application development without relying on external libraries.

In summary, Falcon and PHP-MVC differ in terms of their language, architecture, community and support, speed and performance, ease of use and learning curve, and available features and libraries. These differences make them suitable for different projects and cater to the needs of different developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Falcon
Falcon

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

-
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
Stacks
106
Stacks
84
Followers
222
Followers
201
Votes
3
Votes
89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    Open source
  • 8
    Well designed
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, Falcon?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase