Falcon vs Python

Overview

Python

Stacks262.9K

Followers205.4K

Votes6.9K

GitHub Stars69.7K

Forks33.3K

Falcon

Stacks84

Followers201

Votes89

Falcon vs Python: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Falcon and Python

### 1. Performance:
Falcon is a high-performance web framework specifically designed for building fast APIs, while Python is a general-purpose programming language that offers a wide range of functionalities beyond web development. Falcon's emphasis on performance makes it a preferred choice for projects where speed is crucial.

### 2. Lightweight:
Falcon is lightweight and minimalistic, providing just the essentials for building web APIs without any unnecessary features or bloat, whereas Python is a full-fledged language with a rich standard library and support for various programming paradigms. This lightweight nature of Falcon can be advantageous in projects that require a streamlined approach.

### 3. Routing:
In Falcon, routing is done using URI templates and resource classes, offering a more structured and explicit way of defining API endpoints compared to Python, where routing mechanisms may vary depending on the web framework being used. This consistent approach to routing in Falcon can enhance code readability and maintainability.

### 4. Asynchronous Support:
Falcon has built-in support for asynchronous programming, allowing developers to leverage asynchronous features like coroutines and async/await for improved scalability and responsiveness in API applications. Python, on the other hand, has asynchronous capabilities that need to be explicitly implemented using libraries like asyncio.

### 5. Middleware:
Falcon provides a flexible middleware architecture that enables developers to inject custom logic at various points in the request-response lifecycle, offering greater control and extensibility compared to Python, where middleware implementations can vary significantly across different web frameworks. This middleware support in Falcon can simplify the integration of additional functionalities into API applications.

### 6. Strict Design Philosophy:
Falcon follows a strict design philosophy focused on simplicity, performance, and RESTful principles, which guides the framework's development and feature set. Python, being a general-purpose language, does not enforce such strict design principles for web development, allowing for more flexibility but potentially requiring more effort to maintain a consistent architecture. This design philosophy in Falcon can lead to more consistent and predictable API implementations.

In Summary, Falcon and Python differ in terms of performance, lightweight nature, routing approach, asynchronous support, middleware architecture, and design philosophy.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Python, Falcon

Thomas

Talent Co-Ordinator at Tessian

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

In December we successfully flipped around half a billion monthly API requests from our Ruby on Rails application to some new Python 3 applications. Our Head of Engineering has written a great article as to why we decided to transition from Ruby on Rails to Python 3! Read more about it in the link below.

263k views263k

Comments

Avy

Apr 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

React Native

Python

Flutter

I've been juggling with an app idea and am clueless about how to build it.

A little about the app:

Social network type app ,
Users can create different directories, in those directories post images and/or text that'll be shared on a public dashboard .

Directory creation is the main point of this app. Besides there'll be rooms(groups),chatting system, search operations similar to instagram,push notifications

I have two options:

@{React Native}|tool:2699|, @{Python}|tool:993|, AWS stack or
@{Flutter}|tool:7180|, @{Go}|tool:1005| ( I don't know what stack or tools to use)

722k views722k

Comments

Davit

Apr 11, 2020

Needs advice

Hi everyone, I have just started to study web development, so I'm very new in this field. I would like to ask you which tools are most updated and good to use for getting a job in medium-big company. Front-end is basically not changing by time so much (as I understood by researching some info), so my question is about back-end tools. Which backend tools are most updated and requested by medium-big companies (I am searching for immediate job possibly)?

Thank you in advance Davit

390k views390k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Python	Falcon
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.	Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.
-	Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 69.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 33.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 262.9K	Stacks 84
Followers 205.4K	Followers 201
Votes 6.9K	Votes 89
Pros & Cons
Pros 1186 Great libraries 966 Readable code 848 Beautiful code 789 Rapid development 692 Large community Cons 53 Still divided between python 2 and python 3 28 Performance impact 26 Poor syntax for anonymous functions 22 GIL 20 Package management is a mess	Pros 13 Python 11 FAST 10 Minimal 8 Well designed 8 Open source
Integrations
Django	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Python, Falcon?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Falcon vs Python: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Falcon and Python

### 1. Performance:
Falcon is a high-performance web framework specifically designed for building fast APIs, while Python is a general-purpose programming language that offers a wide range of functionalities beyond web development. Falcon's emphasis on performance makes it a preferred choice for projects where speed is crucial.

### 2. Lightweight:
Falcon is lightweight and minimalistic, providing just the essentials for building web APIs without any unnecessary features or bloat, whereas Python is a full-fledged language with a rich standard library and support for various programming paradigms. This lightweight nature of Falcon can be advantageous in projects that require a streamlined approach.

### 3. Routing:
In Falcon, routing is done using URI templates and resource classes, offering a more structured and explicit way of defining API endpoints compared to Python, where routing mechanisms may vary depending on the web framework being used. This consistent approach to routing in Falcon can enhance code readability and maintainability.

### 4. Asynchronous Support:
Falcon has built-in support for asynchronous programming, allowing developers to leverage asynchronous features like coroutines and async/await for improved scalability and responsiveness in API applications. Python, on the other hand, has asynchronous capabilities that need to be explicitly implemented using libraries like asyncio.

### 5. Middleware:
Falcon provides a flexible middleware architecture that enables developers to inject custom logic at various points in the request-response lifecycle, offering greater control and extensibility compared to Python, where middleware implementations can vary significantly across different web frameworks. This middleware support in Falcon can simplify the integration of additional functionalities into API applications.

### 6. Strict Design Philosophy:
Falcon follows a strict design philosophy focused on simplicity, performance, and RESTful principles, which guides the framework's development and feature set. Python, being a general-purpose language, does not enforce such strict design principles for web development, allowing for more flexibility but potentially requiring more effort to maintain a consistent architecture. This design philosophy in Falcon can lead to more consistent and predictable API implementations.

In Summary, Falcon and Python differ in terms of performance, lightweight nature, routing approach, asynchronous support, middleware architecture, and design philosophy.

Falcon vs Python

Overview