StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Falcon vs Total.js

Falcon vs Total.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89
Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446

Falcon vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Falcon as "High-performance Python framework for building cloud APIs and web app backends". Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks. On the other hand, Total.js is detailed as "Framework for creating rich web sites, web applications, e-commerce and real-time applications". It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC.

Falcon and Total.js belong to "Microframeworks (Backend)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Falcon are:

  • Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes
  • Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes
  • Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class

On the other hand, Total.js provides the following key features:

  • Super fast development
  • Extremely low maintenance costs
  • Rock solid stability

Falcon and Total.js are both open source tools. Falcon with 6.95K GitHub stars and 710 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Total.js with 3.97K GitHub stars and 434 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Falcon
Falcon
Total.js
Total.js

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
446
Stacks
84
Stacks
20
Followers
201
Followers
62
Votes
89
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    Well designed
  • 8
    REST oriented
Pros
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 4
    Great support
  • 3
    UI components
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
  • 2
    Poor design
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Developed as "one man show"
Integrations
Python
Python
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry

What are some alternatives to Falcon, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase