StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Famo.us vs Resium

Famo.us vs Resium

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Famo.us
Famo.us
Stacks19
Followers35
Votes94
GitHub Stars6.2K
Forks681
Resium
Resium
Stacks1
Followers4
Votes1

Famo.us vs Resium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Famo.us and Resium are both powerful tools for creating interactive and engaging user interfaces.

  1. Architecture: Famo.us uses a custom rendering engine to create high-performance animations and transitions, while Resium is built on top of Cesium, utilizing a WebGL-based platform for 3D maps and geospatial data visualization.

  2. Focus: Famo.us primarily focuses on creating smooth and fluid user interfaces for web and mobile applications, offering a vast selection of animation capabilities. In contrast, Resium specializes in integrating 3D mapping and geographic data visualization into web applications.

  3. Community Support: Famo.us has a dedicated community that actively contributes to its libraries and resources, providing extensive documentation and tutorials for developers. On the other hand, Resium caters to a niche market interested in geospatial applications, resulting in a smaller but highly specialized community.

  4. Ease of Use: While Famo.us offers a more user-friendly approach with its intuitive API and tools for developers to quickly prototype and deploy applications, Resium requires a moderate learning curve due to its focus on 3D mapping and geographic data manipulation.

  5. Application Scope: Famo.us is suitable for a wide range of applications, including interactive websites, e-commerce platforms, and mobile apps, giving developers the flexibility to create various user experiences. Resium, however, is specifically designed for applications that require geospatial data visualization, such as location-based services, satellite imagery analysis, and urban planning simulations.

Summary: In conclusion, Famo.us excels in creating smooth user interfaces with advanced animations, while Resium specializes in integrating 3D mapping and geospatial data visualization within web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Famo.us
Famo.us
Resium
Resium

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

It is library of React components for Cesium. It is Strongly Typed and TypeScript is fully supported.

-
React; Fully Documented; Works with React Native WebView; Battle Tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
681
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
19
Stacks
1
Followers
35
Followers
4
Votes
94
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Speedy as native apps
  • 11
    Future
  • 9
    WebGL
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 6
    Components
Pros
  • 1
    Open Source
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Cesium
Cesium
React
React
TypeScript
TypeScript

What are some alternatives to Famo.us, Resium?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase