StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. FeathersJS vs Material UI

FeathersJS vs Material UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
FeathersJS
FeathersJS
Stacks162
Followers341
Votes70
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks793

FeathersJS vs Material UI: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between FeathersJS and Material UI

FeathersJS is a real-time, microservices framework that offers a straightforward coding structure for building scalable applications with minimal effort, while Material UI is a library that provides a set of React components following Google's Material Design guidelines. One of the main differences between the two is their purpose: FeathersJS focuses on backend development and providing a framework for building APIs, whereas Material UI is mainly used for frontend development to create a visually appealing user interface.

## Structure and Architecture:
FeathersJS follows a microservices architecture, making it easy to break down complex applications into smaller modules that can be developed and deployed independently. In contrast, Material UI is a component library that offers pre-designed UI elements such as buttons, cards, and modals, allowing developers to easily implement a consistent design language in their applications without the need for extensive styling.

## State Management:
FeathersJS does not have built-in support for state management, as it primarily focuses on handling HTTP requests and responses. On the other hand, Material UI does not offer state management capabilities either, but it seamlessly integrates with popular state management libraries like Redux and MobX, providing developers with flexibility in managing application state.

## Learning Curve:
FeathersJS requires a solid understanding of Node.js and Express.js to effectively utilize its features, making it more suitable for experienced developers who are comfortable working with JavaScript on the server-side. In comparison, Material UI can be easily integrated into React projects, making it accessible to developers of all skill levels, especially those familiar with React and JSX syntax.

## Customization:
FeathersJS allows for extensive customization by providing hooks and middleware functions that can be used to modify the behavior of services and processes. On the other hand, Material UI offers customization through theme customization and style overrides, allowing developers to tailor the appearance of components to match the design requirements of their applications.

## Community Support:
FeathersJS has a smaller but active community of developers who contribute to the framework and provide support through forums and documentation. Material UI, being a widely-used library, has a larger community with a vast array of resources, including tutorials, forums, and third-party plugins, making it easier to find solutions to common issues and stay updated on best practices in frontend development.

### In Summary, FeathersJS is a backend-focused microservices framework with a scalable architecture, while Material UI is a frontend component library that simplifies UI design following the Material Design principles and offers seamless integration with state management libraries in React applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, FeathersJS

Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
FeathersJS
FeathersJS

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
793
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
162
Followers
3.7K
Followers
341
Votes
445
Votes
70
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 12
    Real-time
  • 7
    Choose any ORM
  • 7
    Datastore Agnostic
  • 6
    Flexible Plugins
  • 5
    Choose Socketio or Primus
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, FeathersJS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase