StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Femas vs Moleculer

Femas vs Moleculer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Moleculer
Moleculer
Stacks59
Followers88
Votes14
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks597
Femas
Femas
Stacks0
Followers2
Votes0

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Moleculer
Moleculer
Femas
Femas

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

It focuses on the running state of microservices and provides one-stop microservice management and control capabilities such as multi-frame unified service discovery, north-south and east-west traffic management, service observability, and configuration management.

Blazing fast; Extensible; Open source; Fault tolerance
Provide SDKs for Java and Go to help users realize multi-language unified management on the same Paas platform; Standardizes and encapsulates microservice capabilities and provides unified access to the layer of irrelevant protocols; Abstracts the capabilities that a microservice application may need to use in the running process into standard API components, which are convenient for expansion and compatible with other open source component ecosystems; The underlying capabilities of Femas are plug-in and standardization, and users can flexibly combine and match the microservice capability matrix according to their needs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
597
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59
Stacks
0
Followers
88
Followers
2
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Many integrations out of the box (db,messaging,tracing)
  • 3
    Typescript
  • 3
    Complete microservices ecosystem without lerning curve
  • 2
    Node.js
  • 2
    High performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Golang
Golang
Linux
Linux
Java
Java
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Moleculer, Femas?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana