StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs Mobile Connect

Firebase Authentication vs Mobile Connect

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55
Mobile Connect
Mobile Connect
Stacks0
Followers2
Votes0

Firebase Authentication vs Mobile Connect: What are the differences?

Firebase Authentication and Mobile Connect are two popular services used for user authentication in mobile applications. Here are the key differences between Firebase Authentication and Mobile Connect:

  1. Integration and Setup: Firebase Authentication is tightly integrated with other Firebase services and can be set up easily using Firebase SDKs. On the other hand, Mobile Connect requires additional setup and integration with the mobile operator's network.

  2. Supported Platforms: Firebase Authentication supports multiple platforms including iOS, Android, and web applications, making it versatile for a wide range of developers. Mobile Connect, however, is primarily focused on mobile platforms and may not be as suitable for web applications.

  3. Features: Firebase Authentication offers a wide range of authentication methods such as email/password, phone number, social logins, and custom authentication options. Mobile Connect primarily relies on SMS-based authentication, limiting the range of authentication options available.

  4. Scalability: Firebase Authentication is known for its scalability and can handle a large number of users and authentication requests efficiently. Mobile Connect may have limitations in terms of scalability, especially when dealing with a high volume of authentication requests.

  5. Customization: Firebase Authentication allows developers to customize the authentication process, email templates, user profiles, and more to fit their specific needs. Mobile Connect may have limitations in terms of customization options, as it is primarily provided by mobile operators.

  6. Pricing: Firebase Authentication offers a free tier with generous limits, making it cost-effective for small to medium-sized applications. Mobile Connect may have pricing structures determined by mobile operators, which could vary based on usage and region.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication and Mobile Connect differ in terms of integration and setup, supported platforms, features, scalability, customization, and pricing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Mobile Connect
Mobile Connect

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

It is a new authentication service based on the Open ID Connect Standard and SIM cards. Its API offers a secure and convenient method to login to your service.

-
Simple, secure authentication; Free to try, easy to use; Access a growing user base
Statistics
Stacks
533
Stacks
0
Followers
610
Followers
2
Votes
55
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Firebase Authentication, Mobile Connect?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope