StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs Spring Security

Firebase Authentication vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks558
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55

Firebase Authentication vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Firebase Authentication is a service provided by Google that allows developers to easily authenticate users in their web or mobile applications. It provides a secure and reliable way to manage user authentication, including email/password authentication, social login, and more. On the other hand, Spring Security is a Java framework that provides a comprehensive security solution for web applications. It includes features such as authentication, authorization, and protection against common security vulnerabilities.

  1. Integration with Platform: Firebase Authentication is a cloud-based service that is tightly integrated with other Firebase products, such as Firebase Realtime Database and Firebase Cloud Messaging. It is designed to work seamlessly with the Firebase platform, allowing developers to build end-to-end solutions using a single set of tools. In contrast, Spring Security is a standalone framework that can be used with various Java-based web application frameworks, such as Spring MVC and Spring Boot. It provides a flexible and modular security solution that can be integrated into existing applications.

  2. Authentication Methods: Firebase Authentication supports a wide range of authentication methods, including email/password authentication, social login (e.g., Google, Facebook), and phone number authentication. It also provides built-in support for two-factor authentication and email verification. Spring Security, on the other hand, supports multiple authentication mechanisms, such as form-based authentication, HTTP basic authentication, and LDAP authentication. It allows developers to customize the authentication process according to their specific requirements.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Firebase Authentication is a cloud-based service that is highly scalable and can handle a large number of concurrent user authentications. It leverages Google's infrastructure to provide fast and reliable authentication services. Spring Security, on the other hand, is a Java-based framework that runs on the application server. Its scalability and performance depend on the underlying infrastructure and configuration.

  4. Server-side vs. Client-side: Firebase Authentication is primarily designed for client-side authentication. It provides client libraries for various platforms, such as web, Android, and iOS, which handle the authentication process on the client side. Spring Security, on the other hand, is a server-side framework that performs authentication on the server and manages session state. It is typically used in traditional web applications where the server is responsible for rendering web pages.

  5. Ease of Use: Firebase Authentication provides a simple and easy-to-use API that allows developers to quickly integrate user authentication into their applications. It handles complex tasks, such as password hashing and secure storage, in the background, making it easy for developers to focus on the core functionality of their applications. Spring Security, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of Java web application development. It offers more flexibility and customization options but may require more effort to set up and configure.

  6. Community and Support: Firebase Authentication is backed by Google and has a large and active community of developers. It provides comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources to help developers get started and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter. Spring Security, on the other hand, is an open-source framework supported by the community. It has a strong user base and provides extensive documentation and community support. However, the level of support may vary depending on the specific implementation and configuration.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication and Spring Security differ in terms of their integration with the platform, authentication methods supported, scalability and performance, client-side vs. server-side functionality, ease of use, and community and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Security, Firebase Authentication

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Security
Spring Security
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
558
Stacks
533
Followers
589
Followers
610
Votes
6
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Java integration
  • 3
    Easy to use
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring Security, Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope