StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Firebase Realtime Database vs Redis

Firebase Realtime Database vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Firebase Realtime Database
Firebase Realtime Database
Stacks107
Followers229
Votes7

Firebase Realtime Database vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Realtime Database and Redis are both popular databases used for various purposes. However, they have several key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Firebase Realtime Database and Redis in a concise manner.

  1. Data Model: Firebase Realtime Database is a NoSQL database that stores data in a JSON-like format. It offers a flexible and hierarchical data structure that allows for efficient and real-time data synchronization between clients. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data structure store that supports various data types such as strings, lists, sets, hashes, and more. It provides high-performance data operations but does not offer the same level of real-time synchronization as Firebase.

  2. Scalability: Firebase Realtime Database is built on Google's infrastructure, which allows for automatic scaling of storage and network resources. It can handle millions of concurrent connections and provides seamless scaling without manual intervention. On the contrary, Redis can also handle high loads and scale horizontally by adding more instances. However, it requires manual scaling and configuration to ensure optimal performance.

  3. Persistence: Firebase Realtime Database offers both in-memory and disk persistence. It synchronizes data in real-time across clients and also stores data on disk for offline access and data durability. Redis, being an in-memory database, does not provide built-in disk persistence. However, it supports snapshotting and persistence to disk through mechanisms like RDB (Redis Database Backup) and AOF (Append-Only File).

  4. Data Querying and Indexing: Firebase Realtime Database supports limited querying capabilities with its orderBy, equalTo, and limitTo methods. It does not offer built-in indexing and requires denormalizing the data to support complex queries. Redis, on the other hand, supports rich data operations and querying capabilities, making it suitable for complex data structures and indexing. It provides various commands for searching and filtering data.

  5. Data Consistency: Firebase Realtime Database ensures strong data consistency through its real-time synchronization mechanism. Any changes made by one client are immediately propagated to other connected clients, ensuring that all clients have consistent data. Redis, being an eventual consistent database, does not provide the same level of strong consistency. It may take some time for data updates to be propagated across all replicas.

  6. Use Cases: Firebase Realtime Database is commonly used in applications that require real-time synchronization such as chat apps, collaboration tools, and multiplayer games. Its ability to handle real-time updates makes it suitable for these use cases. On the other hand, Redis is often used as a caching layer, message broker, or for maintaining session state. Its in-memory nature and high-performance data operations make it ideal for these use cases.

In summary, Firebase Realtime Database and Redis differ in their data models, scalability, persistence, data querying capabilities, data consistency, and use cases. While Firebase Realtime Database excels in real-time synchronization and hierarchical data structures, Redis offers high-performance data operations and supports complex querying and indexing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Firebase Realtime Database
Firebase Realtime Database

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

-
Real time syncing for JSON data;Collaborate across devices with ease;Build serverless apps;Optimized for offline use;Strong user-based security
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
107
Followers
46.5K
Followers
229
Votes
3.9K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 7
    Very fast
  • 0
    Casandra
Cons
  • 2
    Poor query
Integrations
No integrations available
C++
C++
iOS
iOS
Unity
Unity
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Android OS
Android OS
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase

What are some alternatives to Redis, Firebase Realtime Database?

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase