Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?
Introduction
Firebase and Microsoft IIS are two different platforms that offer web hosting and development services. While Firebase is a cloud-based platform, Microsoft IIS is a web server software. Here are the key differences between Firebase and Microsoft IIS:
Scalability: Firebase offers automatic scaling of applications, allowing them to handle large amounts of traffic and users without manual configuration. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS requires manual configuration for scaling, making it less flexible and efficient for handling sudden surges in traffic.
Real-time updates: Firebase provides real-time updates by using WebSockets, allowing instant communication between clients and servers. This makes it ideal for applications that require real-time data synchronization, such as chat apps or collaborative document editing. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for real-time updates, requiring additional development and configuration.
Authentication and authorization: Firebase includes built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms, making it easier to secure applications and control user access to different resources. Microsoft IIS does not provide built-in authentication mechanisms and requires additional configuration and development to implement secure authentication.
Database: Firebase provides a NoSQL database called Firestore, which offers real-time syncing and offline capabilities. It allows developers to quickly store and retrieve data without the need for complex SQL queries. Microsoft IIS does not include a built-in database and requires developers to integrate a separate database system such as SQL Server or MySQL.
Serverless Functions: Firebase allows developers to write and deploy serverless functions, which can be triggered by events in the application. This makes it easy to implement server-side logic without the need for managing infrastructure. Microsoft IIS does not have built-in support for serverless functions and requires developers to set up and manage their own server infrastructure.
Platform support: Firebase is a cross-platform development platform, supporting web, iOS, Android, and more. It provides libraries and SDKs for different platforms, making it easy to develop applications for multiple devices. Microsoft IIS primarily supports Windows-based systems and is optimized for Windows Server, limiting its compatibility with other platforms.
In summary, Firebase provides automatic scalability, real-time updates, built-in authentication, NoSQL database, serverless functions, and cross-platform support, while Microsoft IIS requires manual scaling, additional development for real-time updates and authentication, integration with separate databases, managing server infrastructure for server-side logic, and is primarily optimized for Windows-based systems.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Pros of Microsoft IIS
- Great with .net83
- I'm forced to use iis55
- Use nginx27
- Azure integration18
- Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit15
- Fast10
- Reliable6
- Performance6
- Powerful4
- Simple to configure3
- Webserver3
- Easy setup2
- Shipped with Windows Server1
- Ssl integration1
- Security1
- Охуенный1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2
Cons of Microsoft IIS
- Hard to set up1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Firebase?
What is Microsoft IIS?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Microsoft IIS?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Microsoft IIS?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+5
+12