Firebird vs MySQL vs PostgreSQL: What are the differences?
# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will compare the key differences between Firebird, MySQL, and PostgreSQL.
1. **Storage Engines Compatibility**: Firebird supports stored procedures and triggers, MySQL uses InnoDB for transactions, and PostgreSQL has a focus on extensibility with support for custom indexing methods.
2. **Data Types**: Firebird has a limited set of data types compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL, which offer a wider range of data types including arrays, json, and xml.
3. **Concurrency Control**: Firebird relies on multi-generational architecture for concurrency control, while MySQL uses locking for transactions, and PostgreSQL allows customizable isolation levels with transaction management.
4. **Authentication and Authorization**: Firebird has a simple username/password authentication model, MySQL offers various authentication plugins, and PostgreSQL supports role-based access control with fine-grained permissions.
5. **Triggers and Stored Procedures**: Firebird uses triggers and stored procedures for automation, MySQL supports triggers but has limitations on stored procedures, while PostgreSQL has robust support for both triggers and stored procedures with procedural languages.
6. **Community and Support**: Firebird has a smaller community compared to MySQL and PostgreSQL, which have large and active communities providing extensive documentation and support resources.
In Summary, the key differences between Firebird, MySQL, and PostgreSQL lie in their storage engines compatibility, data types, concurrency control methods, authentication and authorization mechanisms, support for triggers and stored procedures, as well as community and support levels.