StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. FitNesse vs react-testing-library

FitNesse vs react-testing-library

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FitNesse
FitNesse
Stacks32
Followers62
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks712
react-testing-library
react-testing-library
Stacks297
Followers156
Votes4

FitNesse vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

FitNesse and react-testing-library are both tools used for automated testing in software development. Here are the key differences between FitNesse and react-testing-library:

  1. Testing Scope: FitNesse is primarily used for acceptance testing at a higher level of abstraction, focusing on business requirements and user stories, whereas react-testing-library is specifically designed for testing React components at a lower level, targeting UI behaviors and interactions.

  2. Technology Stack: FitNesse supports testing various technologies and platforms beyond just React applications, making it a versatile tool for testing a wide range of software projects. In contrast, react-testing-library is tailored specifically for testing React components and their interactions with the UI.

  3. Testing Approach: FitNesse emphasizes acceptance testing through plain language descriptions and scenario-based tests, encouraging collaboration between business stakeholders and developers. On the other hand, react-testing-library follows a more technical testing approach, focusing on component rendering and user interactions within React applications.

  4. Integration with Frameworks: FitNesse requires setting up and configuring fixtures to integrate with different frameworks and technologies, which can be complex for beginners. In contrast, react-testing-library seamlessly integrates with React projects, providing a more straightforward setup process for testing React components.

  5. Community Support: FitNesse has been around for a longer time and has a well-established community with extensive resources and documentation available for users. While react-testing-library is relatively newer, it has gained popularity within the React community and has a growing number of resources and contributions from developers.

  6. Testing Flexibility: FitNesse offers more flexibility in terms of test automation, allowing users to create custom fixtures and plugins for their testing needs. In comparison, react-testing-library follows a more opinionated approach to testing React components, enforcing best practices and guidelines for writing effective tests.

In Summary, FitNesse and react-testing-library differ in their testing scope, technology stack, approach, integration with frameworks, community support, and testing flexibility, catering to different testing requirements in software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FitNesse
FitNesse
react-testing-library
react-testing-library

It is an open source project. The code base is not owned by any company. A lot of information is shared by the FitNesse community. It's extremely adaptable and is used in areas ranging from Web/GUI tests to testing electronic components.

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

FitNesse is an easy to use wiki web server;Easy to set up: just download the application (a Java jar file) and start it;Specifications/requirements can be used as test input;The major languages are supported
light-weight solution for testing; React DOM testing utilities; works with any environment that provides DOM APIs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
712
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
32
Stacks
297
Followers
62
Followers
156
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation
Integrations
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Java
Java
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to FitNesse, react-testing-library?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana