StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Material UI

Flask vs Material UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445

Flask vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, Flask and Material UI are two widely used tools. Each offers unique features and functionalities that cater to different aspects of web development.

  1. Architecture: Flask is a micro web framework written in Python, focusing on simplicity and minimalism, making it ideal for small-scale web applications. On the other hand, Material UI is a user interface library that provides pre-built components following Google's Material Design guidelines, enabling developers to create visually appealing and consistent designs.

  2. Purpose: Flask is used primarily for backend development, handling routing, request handling, and server-side logic. In contrast, Material UI is focused on frontend development, offering a wide range of customizable UI components to enhance the user experience and interface design of a web application.

  3. Technologies: Flask relies on Python and Werkzeug, a WSGI utility library, for its functionality, while Material UI is built using React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces, allowing for dynamic and interactive web applications.

  4. Customization: Flask provides developers with the flexibility to customize and extend functionality using various Flask extensions and libraries. Material UI, on the other hand, offers a set of predefined components and design principles, making it easier to maintain design consistency across different web pages.

  5. Community Support: Flask has a strong user community and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find solutions and share knowledge. Material UI also has a large community of users, providing support through forums, tutorials, and example projects to help developers leverage its components effectively.

  6. Learning Curve: Flask's straightforward structure and minimalistic approach make it easier for beginners to grasp the basics of web development. In contrast, Material UI's reliance on React and its component-based architecture may require a steeper learning curve for developers new to frontend development.

In Summary, Flask and Material UI offer distinct features tailored for backend and frontend development, respectively, catering to different aspects of web development with their unique architecture, purpose, technologies, customization options, community support, and learning curves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Material-UI

Yuchen
Yuchen

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

server side

Our ML model will be trained locally first. After the local stage, the model will be deployed in the cloud using Flask and Amazon EC2. The data will be stored using MongoDB, and we will use MongoDB Atlas to host it remotely. Below are the reasons why we choose above stacks:

MongoDB and MongoDB Atlas

  • Schema-less (Easy to add/remove attributes)
  • It is easy to set up and run in Amazon EC2

Flask:

  • python library support
  • easy and simple to use

Amazon EC2:

  • Easy to use/configure
  • Secure

Client side

JavaScript will be our main language for front-end. We will use React to build our web interfaces. Material-UI will be used for designing the theme, because it has lots of pre-defined themes. Redis is a great tool for caching due to its in-memory data structure, it can be used to improve user experience. In terms of visualizing data, we use Chart.js. Because it is light weight and easy to learn.

Project management

We use Slack for communication, because it is efficient, light weight and easy to use. GitHub will be used as our primary version control, issue tracking, and roadmapping tool. Because it provides a all-in-one place for code writing and progress tracking.

34.6k views34.6k
Comments
Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Material-UI
Material-UI

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

-
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
16.2K
Followers
3.7K
Votes
60
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Flask, Material-UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase