Flight vs jQuery: What are the differences?
Flight and jQuery are both open source tools. jQuery with 51.9K GitHub stars and 18.3K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Flight with 6.64K GitHub stars and 588 GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, jQuery has a broader approval, being mentioned in 4049 company stacks & 2607 developers stacks; compared to Flight, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.
What is Flight?
What is jQuery?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Flight?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Flight?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Flight?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
jQuery has been the basis of our front end JS for a number of years. The key part for us was that the amount of code saved by using jQuery methods, as opposed to writing out cross-browser compatible alternatives made it a no brainer. In recent years we've had to be clever in how we deliver jQuery on the websites, to ensure it's not render blocking and improve client-side performance but it's still a vital library.
In process of Learning Technics. Cross-browser Compatibility: handles a lot of infuriating cross-browser issues . used to make some widgets and effects: jQuery plugin repository.
jQuery allows to easily do DOM scripting (i.e. HTML elements manipulation and event handling). using jquery under MVC webapps. Studing to know more
jQuery is only used in small amounts, primarily for animations and UIs, but it is included in the WSC, so we felt like not including it here would be kind of cheating. jQuery also almost makes ajax-requests a pleasure to work with, so ... you got that point, jQuery.