StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Flux vs Jenkins X

Flux vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flux
Flux
Stacks526
Followers513
Votes130
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

Flux vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flux and Jenkins X are both popular tools used in the field of software development. While Flux is primarily focused on continuous delivery and GitOps, Jenkins X is a cloud-native continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) solution based on the Jenkins project. Despite some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Configuration Management Approach: Flux follows the GitOps approach, where the desired state of the application is declared in version-controlled manifests. It continuously monitors the Git repository for changes and updates the running environment accordingly. On the other hand, Jenkins X uses a declarative approach for defining pipelines and configurations, allowing developers to specify tasks and dependencies in a Jenkinsfile.

  2. Built-in Infrastructure Support: Jenkins X provides out-of-the-box support for Kubernetes and commonly used cloud providers such as AWS, GCP, and Azure. It abstracts away the complexity of managing infrastructure, enabling developers to focus on building applications. In contrast, Flux is a framework-agnostic tool that can be used with any container orchestration platform, including Kubernetes, Nomad, or Mesos, but it does not provide built-in support for specific cloud providers.

  3. Ease of Use: Flux is relatively easy to set up and use, requiring minimal configuration. It integrates seamlessly with Git and Kubernetes, automating the deployment of applications based on changes in the Git repository. Jenkins X, on the other hand, has a more extensive setup process, including the setup of a Jenkins server, configuring the pipeline, and managing integrations with various tools.

  4. Pipeline Integration: Jenkins X offers a comprehensive pipeline automation solution, allowing the configuration of complex, multi-stage pipelines with support for code review, testing, and deployment stages. It integrates with various tools like SonarQube, Nexus, and Helm. While Flux can be integrated with Jenkins X pipelines, its primary focus is on continuous delivery based on version-controlled manifests and monitoring the Git repository for changes.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Jenkins X benefits from the large and vibrant Jenkins community, which provides extensive documentation, plugins, and integrations. It has a wide ecosystem of tools and extensions, making it highly flexible and customizable. Flux, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing community, with a focus on GitOps practices. It provides integrations with popular tools like Helm and Prometheus, but its ecosystem is more specific to continuous delivery and GitOps practices.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Jenkins X has been around for a longer time and has gained significant adoption in the industry. It has been widely used in various organizations and has a mature feature set. Flux is a relatively newer tool and has gained traction mainly in the context of GitOps and Kubernetes-based environments. It is still evolving and rapidly improving, but its adoption is not as widespread as Jenkins X.

In Summary, Flux and Jenkins X differ in their configuration management approach, built-in infrastructure support, ease of use, pipeline integration capabilities, community and ecosystem, and maturity and adoption. While Flux focuses on GitOps-based continuous delivery, Jenkins X provides a cloud-native CI/CD solution built on top of Jenkins with extensive support for pipelines and integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flux, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flux
Flux
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

-
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
526
Stacks
147
Followers
513
Followers
370
Votes
130
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Unidirectional data flow
  • 32
    Architecture
  • 19
    Structure and Data Flow
  • 14
    Not MVC
  • 12
    Open source
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
React
React
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Flux, Jenkins X?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot