StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Flux vs unistore

Flux vs unistore

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flux
Flux
Stacks526
Followers513
Votes130
unistore
unistore
Stacks18
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks137

Flux vs unistore: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of state management libraries, Flux and unistore are widely used frameworks that offer distinct features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between Flux and unistore is essential for developers to make informed decisions when choosing a state management solution for their applications.

  1. Architecture: Flux follows a unidirectional data flow architecture, where data flows in a single direction, simplifying the debugging process and making it easier to understand the state changes. On the other hand, unistore employs a simple and minimalistic architecture, reducing boilerplate code and providing a more streamlined development experience.

  2. Implementation: Flux requires developers to write more code to set up and manage actions, stores, and dispatchers, making it more suitable for larger applications with complex data flows. In contrast, unistore offers a more lightweight and intuitive implementation, allowing developers to quickly set up and manage state without the overhead of additional abstractions.

  3. Middleware: Flux provides middleware support through libraries like Redux Thunk or Redux Saga, enabling developers to customize and enhance the functionality of their applications. In comparison, unistore includes built-in middleware functionalities, such as logging and debugging tools, simplifying the process of implementing additional features in the application.

  4. Immutability: Flux emphasizes immutability by discouraging direct mutation of state, promoting the use of immutable data structures for managing state changes. Conversely, unistore allows developers to choose their preferred approach to state immutability, providing flexibility in handling state updates according to the specific requirements of the application.

  5. Community Support: The Flux architecture has a robust community backing with a plethora of resources, tutorials, and libraries available to support developers in building scalable and maintainable applications. On the other hand, unistore, being a relatively newer framework, may have a smaller community base, resulting in fewer resources and support options for developers.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Flux and unistore in terms of architecture, implementation, middleware support, immutability, and community backing is crucial for developers to choose the most suitable state management solution for their applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flux
Flux
unistore
unistore

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

A tiny ~650b centralized container with component bindings for React and Preact.

-
Small footprint compliments Preact nicely; Familiar names and ideas from Redux-like libraries; Useful data selectors to extract properties from state; Portable actions can be moved into a common place and imported; Functional actions are just reducers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
137
Stacks
526
Stacks
18
Followers
513
Followers
6
Votes
130
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 44
    Unidirectional data flow
  • 32
    Architecture
  • 19
    Structure and Data Flow
  • 14
    Not MVC
  • 12
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Preact
Preact
React
React
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Flux, unistore?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase