Fluxxor vs Vuetify: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we'll explore the key differences between Fluxxor and Vuetify.

1. **Architecture**: Fluxxor follows the Flux architecture, which involves unidirectional data flow, whereas Vuetify is a UI framework based on Vue.js, which offers a component-based architecture with two-way data binding.
2. **State Management**: Fluxxor provides a central store to manage application state, while Vuetify incorporates Vuex, a state management pattern library for Vue.js, to manage the application's state efficiently.
3. **Component Library**: Vuetify offers a rich set of pre-built UI components that follow Material Design guidelines, enabling faster development and consistency in the user interface. Fluxxor, on the other hand, focuses more on maintaining the data flow and logic of the application rather than providing ready-to-use UI components.
4. **Learning Curve**: Vuetify, being based on Vue.js, has a relatively gentler learning curve for developers familiar with Vue.js and its ecosystem. Fluxxor, with its Flux architecture, may require a steeper learning curve for developers new to this pattern.
5. **Community Support**: Vuetify has a larger and active community due to its association with Vue.js, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources. Fluxxor, being less popular, may have a smaller community, resulting in limited support and resources available.
6. **Customization Flexibility**: Vuetify allows for easy customization of components through theming and props, providing more flexibility in tailoring the user interface. Fluxxor, while flexible in managing data flow, may not offer the same level of customization options for UI components.

In Summary, Fluxxor and Vuetify differ in their architecture, state management approach, component library, learning curve, community support, and customization flexibility.