StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Source Code Management Desktop Apps
  5. Fork vs GitUp vs SourceTree

Fork vs GitUp vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727
GitUp
GitUp
Stacks24
Followers49
Votes36
Fork
Fork
Stacks197
Followers258
Votes126

Fork vs GitUp vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

Differences Between Fork, GitUp, and SourceTree

Fork, GitUp, and SourceTree are popular Git client software that provide graphical interfaces to interact with Git repositories. While all three tools serve the same purpose of facilitating version control and collaboration, there are key differences that set them apart:

  1. Usability and Interface: Fork provides a simplified and user-friendly interface, making it easier for beginners to understand and use. GitUp, on the other hand, offers a minimalist interface with a focus on simplicity and speed. SourceTree offers a comprehensive interface with a wide range of features, making it suitable for both beginners and advanced users.

  2. Cross-platform Availability: Fork is compatible with Mac and Windows operating systems, while GitUp is available only for Mac users. SourceTree is a cross-platform tool available for both Mac and Windows operating systems.

  3. Workspace Management: Fork allows users to work with multiple repositories simultaneously, switching between them easily. GitUp also supports multiple repositories, but its focus is on a single repository at a time. SourceTree offers a similar workspace management feature to Fork, allowing users to handle multiple repositories efficiently.

  4. Branching and Merging: Fork provides seamless branching and merging functionalities, allowing users to create and merge branches with ease. GitUp, although providing branching and merging capabilities, focuses more on visualization and history exploration. SourceTree offers comprehensive branching and merging features with a visually appealing interface.

  5. Conflict Resolution: Fork simplifies the process of resolving conflicts by providing a user-friendly conflict resolution tool. GitUp has a similar conflict resolution feature but with a more minimalist approach. SourceTree offers a robust conflict resolution feature with advanced options and tools.

  6. Third-party Integration: Fork and SourceTree both provide integration with popular third-party services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing seamless collaboration with remote repositories. GitUp, however, does not offer built-in third-party integration.

In Summary, Fork excels in its usability and simplicity, GitUp focuses on speed and minimalism, while SourceTree offers comprehensive features with a visual interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SourceTree, GitUp, Fork

Stefan
Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

  • to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
  • it helps to investigate the history
  • most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SourceTree
SourceTree
GitUp
GitUp
Fork
Fork

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
Highlight a commit and hit the spacebar to quickly see its message and diff.;GitUp gives you full, transparent control over your local checkout, so it's easy to back out from unwanted changes.;GitUp's Snapshot feature builds a Time-Machine-like history of every change made to your repo, allowing you to step backwards to any point in time.;Rewrite, split, delete, and re-order commits, fixup and squash, cherry-pick, merge, rebase—It's all here, and it's lightning-fast.;GitUp puts the power in your fingertips. Surf your repo, make changes, and rewind it all back with a few short keystrokes.
-
Statistics
Stacks
10.6K
Stacks
24
Stacks
197
Followers
8.1K
Followers
49
Followers
258
Votes
727
Votes
36
Votes
126
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    No dark theme (Windows)
  • 5
    Extremely slow
Pros
  • 6
    Can edit commit messages
  • 6
    Fast
  • 5
    Native OSX App
  • 5
    Simple interface
  • 3
    Easy rebase
Pros
  • 19
    One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs
  • 14
    Nice UX
  • 13
    Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast
  • 13
    Does the job way better than others
  • 11
    Dark theme
Cons
  • 2
    Poorly written license
  • 1
    Merges that require interactive user decision
  • 1
    Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial
Git
Git
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to SourceTree, GitUp, Fork?

GitKraken

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

SmartGit

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana