FuelPHP vs Laravel

Overview

Laravel

Stacks28.7K

Followers23.7K

Votes3.9K

GitHub Stars82.6K

Forks24.6K

FuelPHP

Stacks23

Followers34

Votes5

FuelPHP vs Laravel: What are the differences?

Introduction

FuelPHP and Laravel are both PHP frameworks that are widely used for web application development. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

Ease of Use: Laravel is considered to be more user-friendly and beginner-friendly compared to FuelPHP. It provides a clean and elegant syntax, extensive documentation, and a larger community support, making it easier for developers to learn and use.
Features and Functionality: Laravel offers a rich set of features and functionalities out of the box, such as a powerful ORM (Object-Relational Mapping), an intuitive routing system, and a built-in authentication system. In contrast, FuelPHP provides a more lightweight framework that allows developers to choose and add only the specific features they need, making it more customizable.
Community Support: Laravel has a much larger and more active community compared to FuelPHP. This means that there are more readily available resources, tutorials, and plugins for Laravel, allowing developers to easily find solutions to their problems. FuelPHP, on the other hand, has a smaller community, which may result in limited support and resources.
Performance: FuelPHP is known for its high performance and speed, making it a good choice for applications that require quick response times and high efficiency. Laravel, on the other hand, may have slightly lower performance due to its larger size and more extensive features.
Learning Curve: FuelPHP has a steeper learning curve compared to Laravel. Its documentation is not as extensive and the framework itself may require more effort to understand and use effectively. Laravel, on the other hand, provides comprehensive documentation and follows best practices, making it easier for developers to get started and learn.
Ecosystem: Laravel has a larger ecosystem and a higher number of third-party libraries and packages available, which allows developers to easily integrate additional functionalities into their projects. FuelPHP, although not as popular, still has a decent number of libraries and packages, but the choice might be more limited compared to Laravel.

In summary, Laravel is a more beginner-friendly and feature-rich framework with extensive community support, while FuelPHP offers higher performance and a more customizable approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Laravel, FuelPHP

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel	FuelPHP
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.	FuelPHP is a fast, lightweight PHP 5.4 framework. In an age where frameworks are a dime a dozen, We believe that FuelPHP will stand out in the crowd. It will do this by combining all the things you love about the great frameworks out there, while getting rid of the bad.
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 82.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 24.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 28.7K	Stacks 23
Followers 23.7K	Followers 34
Votes 3.9K	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 555 Clean architecture 392 Growing community 370 Composer friendly 344 Open source 325 The only framework to consider for php Cons 54 PHP 33 Too many dependency 23 Slower than the other two 17 A lot of static method calls for convenience 15 Too many include	Pros 2 Open source 1 Fast and secure 1 Supports HMVC 1 Easy to use
Integrations
PHP Django CodeIgniter CakePHP	PHP

What are some alternatives to Laravel, FuelPHP?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

FuelPHP vs Laravel: What are the differences?

Introduction

FuelPHP and Laravel are both PHP frameworks that are widely used for web application development. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

Ease of Use: Laravel is considered to be more user-friendly and beginner-friendly compared to FuelPHP. It provides a clean and elegant syntax, extensive documentation, and a larger community support, making it easier for developers to learn and use.
Features and Functionality: Laravel offers a rich set of features and functionalities out of the box, such as a powerful ORM (Object-Relational Mapping), an intuitive routing system, and a built-in authentication system. In contrast, FuelPHP provides a more lightweight framework that allows developers to choose and add only the specific features they need, making it more customizable.
Community Support: Laravel has a much larger and more active community compared to FuelPHP. This means that there are more readily available resources, tutorials, and plugins for Laravel, allowing developers to easily find solutions to their problems. FuelPHP, on the other hand, has a smaller community, which may result in limited support and resources.
Performance: FuelPHP is known for its high performance and speed, making it a good choice for applications that require quick response times and high efficiency. Laravel, on the other hand, may have slightly lower performance due to its larger size and more extensive features.
Learning Curve: FuelPHP has a steeper learning curve compared to Laravel. Its documentation is not as extensive and the framework itself may require more effort to understand and use effectively. Laravel, on the other hand, provides comprehensive documentation and follows best practices, making it easier for developers to get started and learn.
Ecosystem: Laravel has a larger ecosystem and a higher number of third-party libraries and packages available, which allows developers to easily integrate additional functionalities into their projects. FuelPHP, although not as popular, still has a decent number of libraries and packages, but the choice might be more limited compared to Laravel.

In summary, Laravel is a more beginner-friendly and feature-rich framework with extensive community support, while FuelPHP offers higher performance and a more customizable approach.