FuelPHP vs Symfony

Overview

Symfony

Stacks8.5K

Followers6.2K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars30.7K

Forks9.7K

FuelPHP

Stacks23

Followers34

Votes5

FuelPHP vs Symfony: What are the differences?

FuelPHP and Symfony are both popular PHP frameworks utilized for developing web applications. FuelPHP, known for its flexibility and ease of use, offers a different approach compared to Symfony, a robust and extensive framework. Below are key differences between FuelPHP and Symfony:

Architectural Design: FuelPHP follows the Hierarchical MVC pattern, while Symfony uses the more traditional MVC pattern. This distinction affects how developers structure their code and organize their application's logic.
Built-in Features: Symfony comes equipped with a wide range of built-in features and components, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications. In contrast, FuelPHP provides essential functionalities and allows developers to add components as needed, offering a more lightweight approach.
Learning Curve: Symfony has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive documentation and sophisticated architecture. FuelPHP, on the other hand, is more beginner-friendly, with simpler concepts and easier onboarding for new developers.
Community Support: Symfony boasts a larger and more active community compared to FuelPHP. This leads to more available resources, extensions, and support for developers using Symfony, making it a popular choice for businesses seeking long-term sustainability.
Performance: Symfony is known for its superior performance optimization and scalability, making it a preferred choice for high-traffic websites and enterprise-level applications. FuelPHP, while efficient, may not offer the same level of performance optimization out of the box.
Ecosystem and Integration: Symfony has a vast ecosystem of third-party bundles and tools, facilitating integration with other frameworks and technologies. FuelPHP, while capable of integration, may require more manual setup and configuration for seamless compatibility with external components.

In Summary, FuelPHP and Symfony differ in architectural design, built-in features, learning curve, community support, performance, and ecosystem integration, catering to a diverse range of developer preferences and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Symfony, FuelPHP

Danilo

Senior Software Engineer at WeRoad

Dec 14, 2021

Decided

For a full-stack app or just simple APIs I'd go 100% with Laravel. You get a clean architecture, beautiful documentation and friendly and always growing community: the project is yours, from A to Z. With their docs and resources like Laracast you can start from zero and build what you want, when you want. The learning curve is definitely smaller when compared to Symfony and, with the help of a bit of "magic" (Facades etc.) you get the same results in the half of the time with cleaner code.

105k views105k

Comments

Quade

DevOps Engineer

Jun 27, 2022

Needs adviceon

Django

Python

Symfony

Hi everyone! I'm starting a personal project that I've been postponing for a little while and I need a bit of advice. I thought that it will be a bit of a challenge but I figure the best way to learn is by doing!

The plan is to build an app with loads of automation build in for reporting which would make it very easy to perform tasks, The plan is to build something similar to an HR app using microservice architecture, separating services e.g. employee data, payroll (including calculations based on easily entered info like tax %), employee services (vacation, sick day allowance booking and tabulation) and automated reporting on a pre-defined schedule (bi-weekly, monthly).

I am considering Django (as I currently know a bit of Python) and Symfony (as a friend who is a developer recommended it) but I am well aware there are other (and probably better) tools out there for the job (like maybe ExpressJS/Node.js for the backend and React/Vue.js for the front).

Background:

I have got knowledge as a DevOps, Site Reliability and Cloud engineer so once the app is built I'm very comfortable taking it to deployment.

Thank you all for your help and responses.

72.4k views72.4k

Comments

Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceon

GraphQL

C++

Symfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Symfony	FuelPHP
It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..	FuelPHP is a fast, lightweight PHP 5.4 framework. In an age where frameworks are a dime a dozen, We believe that FuelPHP will stand out in the crowd. It will do this by combining all the things you love about the great frameworks out there, while getting rid of the bad.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 30.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 8.5K	Stacks 23
Followers 6.2K	Followers 34
Votes 1.1K	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Open source 149 Php 130 Community 129 Dependency injection 122 Professional Cons 10 Too many dependency 8 Lot of config files 4 YMAL 3 Feature creep 1 Bloated	Pros 2 Open source 1 Fast and secure 1 Easy to use 1 Supports HMVC
Integrations
CakePHP PHP ReactPHP	PHP

What are some alternatives to Symfony, FuelPHP?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

FuelPHP vs Symfony: What are the differences?

Architectural Design: FuelPHP follows the Hierarchical MVC pattern, while Symfony uses the more traditional MVC pattern. This distinction affects how developers structure their code and organize their application's logic.
Built-in Features: Symfony comes equipped with a wide range of built-in features and components, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications. In contrast, FuelPHP provides essential functionalities and allows developers to add components as needed, offering a more lightweight approach.
Learning Curve: Symfony has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive documentation and sophisticated architecture. FuelPHP, on the other hand, is more beginner-friendly, with simpler concepts and easier onboarding for new developers.
Community Support: Symfony boasts a larger and more active community compared to FuelPHP. This leads to more available resources, extensions, and support for developers using Symfony, making it a popular choice for businesses seeking long-term sustainability.
Performance: Symfony is known for its superior performance optimization and scalability, making it a preferred choice for high-traffic websites and enterprise-level applications. FuelPHP, while efficient, may not offer the same level of performance optimization out of the box.
Ecosystem and Integration: Symfony has a vast ecosystem of third-party bundles and tools, facilitating integration with other frameworks and technologies. FuelPHP, while capable of integration, may require more manual setup and configuration for seamless compatibility with external components.

FuelPHP vs Symfony

Overview