StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. FullStack Boilerplate vs Next.js

FullStack Boilerplate vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate
Stacks7
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

FullStack Boilerplate vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown, we will discuss the key differences between FullStack Boilerplate and Next.js.

  1. Server-Side Rendering: FullStack Boilerplate does not support server-side rendering out of the box, while Next.js has built-in support for server-side rendering, which can improve SEO and performance by generating HTML on the server.

  2. File Structure: FullStack Boilerplate comes with a predefined file structure and configurations for both client and server-side code, while Next.js allows more flexibility in structuring the project as it follows the conventions of a typical React project.

  3. Routing: FullStack Boilerplate uses traditional client-side routing, which can lead to slower initial page loads, as it depends on JavaScript to render pages, compared to Next.js, which offers optimized server-side routing for faster navigation between pages.

  4. Middleware Support: FullStack Boilerplate may require additional setup for middleware functions and API integration, whereas Next.js comes with built-in middleware support, making it easier to handle authentication, data fetching, and other server-side functionality.

  5. Automatic Code Splitting: Next.js provides automatic code splitting, allowing only the necessary code to be loaded for each page, resulting in faster load times and better performance, while FullStack Boilerplate may need manual optimization for code splitting.

  6. Zero Configuration: Next.js prides itself on "zero configuration" setup, making it effortless to start a project without dealing with complex setups, while FullStack Boilerplate may require more initial configuration and setup to have all the necessary dependencies and tools working together smoothly.

In Summary, understanding the differences between FullStack Boilerplate and Next.js can help developers choose the right framework based on their project requirements and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, FullStack Boilerplate

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
FullStack Boilerplate
FullStack Boilerplate

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
7
Followers
5.1K
Followers
30
Votes
330
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
TypeScript
TypeScript
Apollo
Apollo
React Native
React Native
GraphQL
GraphQL
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Next.js, FullStack Boilerplate?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase