FullStack Boilerplate vs Phalcon: What are the differences?
What is FullStack Boilerplate? React Native Web with TypeScript, Node.js & GraphQL. The client was built using react-native-web really easy to turn into a mobile app. The server is written in Node.js.and uses GraphQL with apollo-server for delivering data between client and server and typegoose for interacting with Mongo.
What is Phalcon? Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP. Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.
FullStack Boilerplate and Phalcon belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.
FullStack Boilerplate and Phalcon are both open source tools. It seems that FullStack Boilerplate with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.83K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Phalcon with 9.73K GitHub stars and 1.78K GitHub forks.
What is FullStack Boilerplate?
What is Phalcon?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose FullStack Boilerplate?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using FullStack Boilerplate?
What companies use FullStack Boilerplate?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
'm a professional web developer from Vietnam with B.S Physics and Engineering. I'm a Phalcon enthusiast as Opensource. In free time, I was support on forum Phalcon also my forum and contribution core Phalcon.
I think precompiled PHP is the way to go. It saves CPU cycles, RAM and overall I/O. It saves money too. Smaller requirements = smaller bills.
I've tried symfony and zend. Phalcon was easiest to use.