StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Load Testing
  4. Load And Performance Testing
  5. Gatling vs LoadNinja

Gatling vs LoadNinja

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gatling
Gatling
Stacks244
Followers318
Votes21
GitHub Stars6.8K
Forks1.2K
LoadNinja
LoadNinja
Stacks12
Followers40
Votes0

Gatling vs LoadNinja: What are the differences?

1. **Protocol Support**: Gatling primarily supports HTTP and Websocket protocols, whereas LoadNinja provides support for a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, web services, and FTP. 2. **Scripting Language**: Gatling uses Scala as its scripting language, which may require familiarity with the language, while LoadNinja allows users to create and customize test scripts using an easy-to-use, codeless script editor. 3. **Cloud-Based Testing**: LoadNinja offers a cloud-based solution for testing, allowing for easy scalability and resource management, whereas Gatling requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure for load testing. 4. **Real-Time Performance Metrics**: LoadNinja provides real-time performance metrics and analytics during the test execution, enabling users to monitor and analyze the test results immediately, while Gatling requires users to manually analyze the test results post-execution. 5. **Browser-Based Load Testing**: LoadNinja offers browser-based load testing, allowing users to simulate realistic user interactions on a web application, while Gatling focuses on server-side load testing without the ability to simulate client-side interactions. 6. **Pricing Model**: Gatling is an open-source tool with a free version available, while LoadNinja offers a subscription-based pricing model with various plans tailored to different testing needs.

In Summary, Gatling is a server-side load testing tool with limited protocol support and scripting language options, whereas LoadNinja offers a comprehensive solution with support for various protocols, real-time metrics, browser-based testing, and a cloud-based infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gatling, LoadNinja

Vrashab
Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceonGatlingGatlingLocustLocustFlood IOFlood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k
Comments
Aravinth
Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gatling
Gatling
LoadNinja
LoadNinja

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Simulating heavy traffic; Load testing as code for CI/CD integration & automation; API Load testing; Automated deployment of load injectors; Response times reports
Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
244
Stacks
12
Followers
318
Followers
40
Votes
21
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
Cons
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Jenkins
Jenkins
Zephyr
Zephyr

What are some alternatives to Gatling, LoadNinja?

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Soundkit

Soundkit

Voice agent QA for teams who can't afford broken calls, compliance gaps, or production failures. Simulate thousands of conversations, validate legal

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope