StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Semantic UI vs gentelella

Semantic UI vs gentelella

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
gentelella
gentelella
Stacks79
Followers90
Votes0

Semantic UI vs gentelella: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares key differences between Semantic UI and Gentelella for website development.

1. **User Interface Components**: Semantic UI provides a wide range of pre-designed user interface components and themes, making it easier to create visually appealing websites without the need for extensive design work. On the other hand, Gentelella focuses more on providing a dashboard template with components tailored towards data visualization and management, catering to a specific use case.
   
2. **Documentation and Support**: Semantic UI boasts comprehensive documentation with detailed explanations and examples for each component, making it easier for developers to implement and customize them. In contrast, Gentelella lacks extensive documentation and support, which may pose challenges for developers seeking detailed guidance and assistance.

3. **Customization Flexibility**: Semantic UI offers easy customization through variables and theming options, allowing developers to modify the appearance of components to match their brand or design requirements. Gentelella, on the other hand, has limited customization options, leading to less flexibility in adapting the template to specific design needs.

4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Semantic UI has a large and active community of developers contributing plugins, extensions, and additional resources to enhance the framework's functionality. In contrast, Gentelella has a smaller community and less third-party support, limiting the available ecosystem for developers to leverage in their projects.

5. **Focus on Mobile Responsiveness**: Semantic UI prioritizes mobile responsiveness by providing responsive design elements and grid systems out of the box, ensuring that websites built with the framework are optimized for various devices and screen sizes. Gentelella, while offering some level of responsiveness, may require additional customization to achieve the same level of mobile optimization.

6. **Browser Compatibility**: Semantic UI is well-tested and supported across various modern browsers, ensuring consistent rendering and functionality across different platforms. Gentelella may have limitations in terms of browser compatibility, leading to potential display issues or inefficient performance on certain browsers.

In Summary, the key differences between Semantic UI and Gentelella lie in their focus on user interface components, documentation and support, customization flexibility, community and ecosystem, mobile responsiveness, and browser compatibility in website development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, gentelella

Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
gentelella
gentelella

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

This template uses several libraries for charts, calendar, form validation, wizard style interface, off-canvas navigation menu, text forms, date range, upload area, form autocomplete, range slider, progress bars, notifications and much more.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
79
Followers
1.5K
Followers
90
Votes
673
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
Bootstrap
Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, gentelella?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase