Ghostscript vs Pandoc: What are the differences?
# Key Differences Between Ghostscript and Pandoc
Ghostscript and Pandoc are both powerful tools used in document processing, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are the top 6 differences between Ghostscript and Pandoc.
1. **File Format Support**: Ghostscript is primarily focused on PostScript and PDF files, whereas Pandoc supports a wide range of input and output file formats including Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, and MS Word.
2. **Functionality**: Ghostscript is mainly used for interpreting PostScript and PDF files for viewing or printing, while Pandoc is a versatile document converter that can handle various input and output formats for documentation purposes.
3. **Markdown Support**: Pandoc natively supports Markdown format, making it a popular choice for writers and developers for seamless conversion between formats, whereas Ghostscript lacks direct support for Markdown.
4. **Customization Options**: Ghostscript provides extensive customization options for post-processing PDF files, allowing users to fine-tune the output, while Pandoc offers a more straightforward approach to document conversion with limited customization options.
5. **Community and Support**: Pandoc has a larger and more active community, providing better support and frequent updates, compared to Ghostscript, which has a smaller community and may lack immediate assistance for users.
6. **License**: Ghostscript is distributed under the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) with additional commercial licensing options, while Pandoc is released under the GNU General Public License (GPL), making it more suitable for open-source projects.
In Summary, Ghostscript and Pandoc differ in file format support, functionality, Markdown compatibility, customization options, community support, and licensing terms, making them suitable for different document processing needs.