Git vs Git Reflow vs Mercurial

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Git

288.2K
173.2K
+ 1
6.6K
Git Reflow

4
11
+ 1
0
Mercurial

229
216
+ 1
105
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Git
Pros of Git Reflow
Pros of Mercurial
  • 1.4K
    Distributed version control system
  • 1.1K
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 845
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
  • 368
    Great command-line application
  • 306
    Simple
  • 291
    Free
  • 232
    Easy to use
  • 222
    Does not require server
  • 27
    Distributed
  • 22
    Small & Fast
  • 18
    Feature based workflow
  • 15
    Staging Area
  • 13
    Most wide-spread VSC
  • 11
    Role-based codelines
  • 11
    Disposable Experimentation
  • 7
    Frictionless Context Switching
  • 6
    Data Assurance
  • 5
    Efficient
  • 4
    Just awesome
  • 3
    Github integration
  • 3
    Easy branching and merging
  • 2
    Compatible
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 2
    Possible to lose history and commits
  • 1
    Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
  • 1
    Light
  • 1
    Team Integration
  • 1
    Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
  • 1
    CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
  • 1
    It's what you do
  • 0
    Phinx
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 18
      A lot easier to extend than git
    • 17
      Easy-to-grasp system with nice tools
    • 13
      Works on windows natively without cygwin nonsense
    • 11
      Written in python
    • 9
      Free
    • 8
      Fast
    • 6
      Better than Git
    • 6
      Best GUI
    • 4
      Better than svn
    • 2
      Hg inc
    • 2
      Good user experience
    • 2
      TortoiseHg - Unified free gui for all platforms
    • 2
      Consistent UI
    • 2
      Easy-to-use
    • 2
      Native support to all platforms
    • 1
      Free to use

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Git
    Cons of Git Reflow
    Cons of Mercurial
    • 16
      Hard to learn
    • 11
      Inconsistent command line interface
    • 9
      Easy to lose uncommitted work
    • 7
      Worst documentation ever possibly made
    • 5
      Awful merge handling
    • 3
      Unexistent preventive security flows
    • 3
      Rebase hell
    • 2
      When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
    • 2
      Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
    • 1
      Doesn't scale for big data
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 0
        Track single upstream only
      • 0
        Does not distinguish between local and remote head

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Git?

      Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

      What is Git Reflow?

      Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

      What is Mercurial?

      Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Git?
      What companies use Git Reflow?
      What companies use Mercurial?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Git?
        What tools integrate with Git Reflow?
        What tools integrate with Mercurial?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

        Pinterest

        GitJenkinsKafka+7
        3
        2139
        GitJenkinsGroovy+4
        4
        2641
        GitCloudBees+2
        3
        4432
        Git.NETCloudBees+3
        6
        1065
        Mar 4 2020 at 5:14PM

        Atlassian

        GitBitbucketWindows+4
        3
        1040
        GitNode.jsFirebase+5
        7
        2356
        What are some alternatives to Git, Git Reflow, and Mercurial?
        GitHub
        GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
        SVN (Subversion)
        Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
        Bitbucket
        Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
        Perforce
        Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise.
        GitLab
        GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
        See all alternatives