StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. Git vs GitKraken

Git vs GitKraken

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git
Git
Stacks343.7K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K
GitKraken
GitKraken
Stacks725
Followers909
Votes290

Git vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git and GitKraken are both software tools used for version control and collaboration in software development. While both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between Git and GitKraken that distinguish them from each other.

  1. Platform Compatibility: Git is a command-line tool that can be used on various platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, GitKraken is a standalone application that provides a graphical user interface (GUI) and is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems.

  2. User Interface (UI): Git relies on command-line commands and requires users to have knowledge of specific commands to perform various version control actions. In contrast, GitKraken provides a visually appealing and intuitive UI that simplifies the version control process, allowing users to perform actions like branching, merging, and committing with simple drag-and-drop gestures.

  3. Visual Representation: Git primarily displays file changes and commits through a text-based interface, which can sometimes make it difficult for users to visualize the project's history. GitKraken, on the other hand, offers a more visual representation of the repository with features like interactive graphs, code editors, and commit timelines, making it easier to understand the project's structure and history.

  4. Collaboration Features: GitKraken provides additional collaboration features that enhance team coordination and communication. It allows users to view and manage pull requests, assign tasks, and create code reviews directly within the application. Git, on the other hand, does not have these collaboration features built-in, although it can integrate with other platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket for collaboration purposes.

  5. Ease of Use for Beginners: GitKraken is more beginner-friendly compared to Git, especially for developers who are new to version control. The GUI provided by GitKraken simplifies the learning curve by visually representing actions and providing tooltips and hints, making it easier for beginners to grasp Git concepts and workflows. Git, being a command-line tool, requires users to understand and remember specific commands.

  6. Customizability and Flexibility: Git offers a high level of customizability and flexibility due to its command-line interface. Developers can use various tools and scripts to automate tasks and fine-tune their Git workflows according to their specific needs. GitKraken, while providing a user-friendly experience, may have certain limitations compared to the flexibility provided by Git's command-line interface.

In summary, Git and GitKraken differ in terms of platform compatibility, user interface, visual representation, collaboration features, ease of use for beginners, and customizability. Git is a command-line tool compatible with multiple platforms and offers extensive customization options, while GitKraken is a GUI-based application with intuitive visuals, enhanced collaboration features, and a beginner-friendly approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git
Git
GitKraken
GitKraken

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
343.7K
Stacks
725
Followers
184.2K
Followers
909
Votes
6.6K
Votes
290
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
Pros
  • 60
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Full featured client
  • 21
    Gitflow support
Cons
  • 4
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 4
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 4
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 3
    Not as many features as sourcetree
  • 3
    Do not allow to directly edit staging area

What are some alternatives to Git, GitKraken?

SourceTree

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

GitUp

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

DVC

DVC

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana