StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. GitCop vs ktlint

GitCop vs ktlint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitCop
GitCop
Stacks1
Followers42
Votes0
ktlint
ktlint
Stacks16
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.6K
Forks518

GitCop vs ktlint: What are the differences?

  1. Configuration Options: GitCop primarily focuses on enforcing code style conventions related to commits and pull requests, while ktlint is more specific to the Kotlin language and enforces coding style rules within Kotlin files.
  2. Integration: GitCop integrates seamlessly with Git and GitHub, providing automated checks on commit messages and pull requests, whereas ktlint can be integrated into the build process of a Kotlin project for continuous code style validation.
  3. Supported Languages: GitCop offers support for any language that uses Git as version control, making it versatile for various projects, while ktlint is specifically tailored for Kotlin projects, providing language-specific rules and checks.
  4. Rule Customization: GitCop allows for the customization of rules related to commit messages and pull requests to fit the team's specific needs, while ktlint provides a set of predefined rules for Kotlin code style that can be extended or modified based on project requirements.
  5. Feedback Mechanism: GitCop provides feedback directly in the pull request comments, guiding developers on how to improve their commit messages, whereas ktlint offers feedback in the form of console output or integrated IDE plugins for immediate code style corrections.
  6. Community Support: GitCop has a strong community following with regular updates and contributions, ensuring the tool's relevance and effectiveness, while ktlint benefits from the Kotlin community's input for enhancements and new features specific to the language.

In Summary, GitCop focuses on code style conventions for commits and pull requests across different languages, while ktlint specializes in enforcing coding style rules within Kotlin projects, integrated and tailored specifically for Kotlin development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitCop
GitCop
ktlint
ktlint

Free for open source projects;Any time a pull request is raised on your repository, each commit in the pull request is checked against the repository rules. If any commits do not follow the provided rules, a comment is left against the pull request.

An anti-bikeshedding Kotlin linter with built-in formatter.

Instant Pull Request Feedback;Easy to Get Going;Many Customization Options;Use Your Own GitHub Bot
No configuration; Built-in formatter; Customizable output; A single executable jar with all dependencies included
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
518
Stacks
1
Stacks
16
Followers
42
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to GitCop, ktlint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana