StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs Plastic SCM

GitHub Enterprise vs Plastic SCM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM
Stacks40
Followers75
Votes17

GitHub Enterprise vs Plastic SCM: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between GitHub Enterprise and Plastic SCM

GitHub Enterprise and Plastic SCM are two popular version control solutions used for managing source code and collaborating on software development projects. Below are the key differences between the two platforms:

1. **Version Control System**: GitHub Enterprise is built on top of the Git version control system, which is widely used for its distributed nature and speed in handling large projects. On the other hand, Plastic SCM uses a centralized version control system that offers branching and merging capabilities beyond what Git provides, using a unique branching model known as "branch per task."

2. **Scalability and Performance**: GitHub Enterprise is known for its scalability and reliability, catering to the needs of large organizations with a vast number of developers working on multiple projects simultaneously. Plastic SCM, although capable of handling large projects, may not scale as seamlessly as GitHub Enterprise for extremely large teams due to its centralized architecture.

3. **User Interface and User Experience**: GitHub Enterprise has a user-friendly and intuitive interface that is easy to navigate, making it popular among new developers and non-technical team members. Plastic SCM, while powerful in terms of functionality, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive feature set and customization options.

4. **Workflow and Collaboration Features**: GitHub Enterprise provides robust collaboration features such as pull requests, code review tools, and extensive integration with third-party services like JIRA and Slack. Plastic SCM also offers similar features but emphasizes a different workflow approach with its branch per task model, which may require a different mindset for teams accustomed to Git workflows.

5. **Security and Access Control**: GitHub Enterprise offers enterprise-grade security features such as SAML single sign-on, fine-grained access control, and audit logs to ensure data protection and compliance standards are met. Plastic SCM also provides security measures, but the extent of customization and control over access permissions may vary compared to GitHub Enterprise.

6. **Customization and Extensibility**: GitHub Enterprise allows for extensive customization through integrations with various tools and services in the software development ecosystem, fostering a seamless and efficient workflow for development teams. Plastic SCM also supports integrations but may have limitations in terms of third-party services compatibility and extensibility compared to GitHub Enterprise.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and Plastic SCM differ in their underlying version control systems, scalability, user interface, collaboration features, security measures, and customization options, catering to different needs and preferences within the software development industry.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Plastic SCM
Plastic SCM

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Distributed version control system;Branch Explorer;Semantic Version Control;Locking;Huge files;Big projects;GitSync;Super strong merging;Partial replica;ACL security;Database backends
Statistics
Stacks
500
Stacks
40
Followers
627
Followers
75
Votes
10
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 2
    Code security
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
Pros
  • 8
    Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it
  • 4
    No Size limite
  • 2
    File Locking
  • 2
    Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid
  • 1
    Very fast
Cons
  • 1
    Always uses automatic conflict resolution first
  • 1
    Doesn't have file staging
  • 1
    No dark theme
  • 1
    Can't place windows next to each other to save space
  • 1
    Keyboard shortcuts are lacking
Integrations
No integrations available
Gluon
Gluon
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jenkins
Jenkins
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio
Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, Plastic SCM?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana